Eeihq

Speedy deletion of Garbowicz, RJ

A tag has been placed on Garbowicz, RJ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 00:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Robert J Garbowicz AKA RJ

A tag has been placed on Robert J Garbowicz AKA RJ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 02:35, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:RJ Garbowicz .png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:RJ Garbowicz .png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 03:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Robert J Garbowicz AKA RJ. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 03:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Robert J Garbowicz AKA RJ, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 04:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Robert J Garbowicz AKA RJ

A tag has been placed on Robert J Garbowicz AKA RJ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 04:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Robert J Garbowicz AKA RJ, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have continued to re-create this page despite warnings not to and the page having been deleted. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 04:35, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you.

Speedy deletion of Robert J Garbowicz AKA RJ

A tag has been placed on Robert J Garbowicz AKA RJ, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 04:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disrupting by repeatedly creating articles on non-notable subjects that you have a conflict of interest regarding. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —C.Fred (talk) 04:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

ok C FRED

so once again, what do you need to make this notable. My corporate site has a lot of info, sunbiz.org the florida website has my businesses on it, irs.gov shows my corporate and personal income statements. Its all public knowledge. The is also tv shows with me on it, commercials with my company on youtube, you can even call george wendt who is my cousin, I will give you his agents number and he can validate all this bs you are talking about

i dont appreciate you deleting all the work that I just took hours creating so I will call wiki's corporate office tomorrow if my account and information is not reposted by you and i will have your account deleted for abuse and then i will send you a bill for my time.

Regards,

RJ Garbowicz President/CEO Extreme Enterprises, Inc

Since you were able to recreate it in five minutes, based on the history of your deleted contributions, I don't see what the concern about the text is. Actually, I went to your corporate site while checking up on the article, and there was no information about you on it. I will go ahead and recreate the article as your user page, but I would suggest that you read up on the guidelines for notability for biographies, as your article made no clear assertion that you meet them. Additionally, articles must be supported by reliable sources - and relatives do not qualify in that regard. Thirdly, I would point out the conflict of interest guidelines and guidelines for autobiographies.

Finally, two points about your comment above. First, attempting to bill Wikipedia would be ludicrous, since you gave the information freely (as in beer) to Wikipedia when you uploaded it under the GFDL. You do not own articles that you create. Secondly, although it is not a legal threat, your comments above could be taken as a threat. Threatening other editors usually leads to a prolonged block; legal threats can be grounds for indefinitely blocking an account. —C.Fred (talk) 22:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Oops. When I went to recreate the article, I saw that you admitted to using a sockpuppet account here. Accordingly, I am not userfying the article, and I am extending your block for abuse of multiple accounts. —C.Fred (talk) 22:25, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 74 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts to avoid a block. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —C.Fred (talk) 22:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)