Eframgoldberg

I thought i did this too.

Ben Wedeman article - discretionary sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Please be sure to read the whole talk page: Talk:Ben Wedeman, especially the notices at the top, and the discussion below. Jytdog (talk) 20:23, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for showing me that, I did not know this specific issue has already been discussed in detail. I read the discussion and it seems there were several reasons for removing the piece that changed over time, so could you please clarify which they were? I know there was: 1. an objection of the length of relative to the rest of the article, 2. the accusations were not from reliable sources, 3. the accusations have to do with the headlines and ticker notices about the attack and although Wedeman's name was on the articles, there is uncertainty as to burden of proof in determining if Wedeman actually wrote or approved the headlines?

There is an expected integrity that we expect to transcend all journalism and one can make a case that the being accurate, neutral, and diligent are responsibilities that a proportional to a reporters notoriety. I think it is therefore more important that be people be aware of any bias especially when the reporter is famous. This importance, should not mean that small, meaningless, or fabricated accusations should be given more credibility, but I think if there is bias, it is more important to report it. That being said, what requirements would there be for the inclusion of accusations of bias into a LBP of an acclaimed journalist? Eframgoldberg (talk) 21:59, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. If you read the talk page, you will see that the sources are clear that the error was the people at CNN who did the scroll and it has nothing to do with him. Jytdog (talk) 22:52, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Hello, I'm Eteethan. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Pythiosis  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eteethan(talk)🎄 22:36, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

I removed inaccurate information and added supplemental information. for example, there is a case report of infection by another species that I updated. I wasn't able to put the references but I will today. Thanks.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Eframgoldberg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roger Waters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ADL. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

~ ~ ~ Merry Christmas! ~ ~ ~

Hello Eframgoldberg: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, --Dustfreeworld (talk) 12:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC)