Ehinger222

User talk:Ehinger222/Archive 1

your (non) retirement

hey ehinger222, given you were back on board the other day, perhaps it might be an idea to log in when you make other edits. when anon edits from down your way reply to each other from different ip's making the same spelling mistakes etc. it looks a little dodgy.

welcome back, your contribution to the triseries debate was good, happy editing (sincerely - the more the merrier!). Dibo 04:00, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop blanking content

Hi there! Please stop blanking content in the Super League article. Regardless of the fact that you haven't heard of the term outside of its rugby league uses does not mean that it isn't a popular term for many different sports in many different parts of the world. The rugby league competitions are mentioned and the page conforms to Wikipedia's manual of style. Cheers hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 13:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Please consult the Super League talk page. I've posted a comment regarding the threat of an edit war on that page, and hope to encourage Hoopydink into the discussion. Ajcham 15:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

World Cups

Hi Ehinger222, I have changed the History of the RWC page again. The point of the lead is to show that union was the last out of cricket/soccer/union to start. It really has nothing to do with league. But I have included a mention of when the RLWC started in the page. So I hope that is fine. Also please stop going around changing RWC to RUWC, and giving the 1954 RLWC the title of RWC. It was not known as that, but was called Coupe du Monde Rugby XIII (Rugby League). You have made some good additions to wikipedia in terms of league, but please don't spoil it by making silly edits like changing links to Rugby Union World Cup. Rugby World Cup is the official name. Cheers. Cvene64 13:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up

Thanks for alerting me about the naming convention debate on Rugby Super League. Outside Center 02:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

French RL

"After WWII, some rugby union clubs were firebombed by treizantes seeking revenge and percieving rugby union clubs as collaborating elements. Some rugby union officials also felt the wrath of the general anti-collaberationist behaviour of post war France and were promptly shot."

Where have you find the above ??, pure dream from you !!!!!!!!!!!

I delete, jp from France (53 years in RL)

---

as the French rugby union collaberated with the Nazis in northern France and the nazi puppets in the south of France.

It is clear that you don't know the vichy policy for sport and the other sport federations forbidden !!!!!!!!!
You take your dream for reality even if some RU managers had fascits ideas !!!
Are you sure that French RL have had no collaborionist RL managers ?? In France we are not sure !!!! because plenty of money to re-install the federation, the game, the clubs !!!!!

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_R%C3%A9volution_nationale#La_politique_sportive

I delete your comments, jp from France (53 years in RL)

Survey Q

Have you ever been to the southern hemisphere, click here to reply.AstroBoy 01:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC) Deadline for entries is December 15th

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ehinger222 (2nd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Dibo | Talk | Contribs 23:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Sydney Morning Herald

I noticed you reverted my change to the Sydney Morning Herald's political leanings. Please explain why. The general consensus on the discussion page is that the paper is at least centrist politically especially when compared with other "conservative" publications like The Australian. I live in Sydney myself and read the paper most days and I too can say that it often does not approach political issues from the right and is probably more left leaning in its general world view. Imalegend (talk) 05:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sean Fagan

Hello, Ehinger222. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Sean Fagan".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 02:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)