September 2007

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with EHL Junior Enterprise. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Precious Roy 08:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Stop removing valid tags from EHL Junior Enterprise. Until verifiable references from reliable third-party sources are added to the article, the references will indeed need improving. The speedy deletion tag will be removed by the admin who decides whether or not to delete the article. Continuing to remove valid tags without reason will be considered disruptive and you may be blocked from editing.

AfD nomination of EHL Junior Enterprise

edit

EHL Junior Enterprise, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that EHL Junior Enterprise satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EHL Junior Enterprise and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of EHL Junior Enterprise during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Maxim(talk) 00:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Username concern

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

Thank you. shoy 15:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply