El Chivo 2
El Chivo 2, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi El Chivo 2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
As a courtesy to other contributors could you please explain controversial or complicated edits on the talk page -- not in your edit summary?
editAs a courtesy to other contributors could you please explain controversial or complicated edits on the talk page -- not in your edit summary?
You made what seemed to me to be a controversial edit to Raymond Allen Davis -- that you explained only in your edit summary.
As I explained on Talk:Raymond Allen Davis, complicated or controversial edits, that are explained only in an edit summary are the most common trigger for edit warring.
I request you go to the talk page and offer a fuller explanation.
Thanks Geo Swan (talk) 09:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- the edit summary is just that, a summary. but, you can see the details of the change by clicking the "prev" link on the left side of the summary. --El Chivo 2 (talk) 22:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- And, as I explained, it is a technique that triggers edit wars. I avoided the trigger to edit warring. Instead I have asked you to explain why you think Al Jazeera's English language service is not an "impartial source". I really think you should make that effort. Geo Swan (talk) 05:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
No refs on disambiguation pages
editHi, I just undid this edit of yours. See wp:DABREF. - DVdm (talk) 15:35, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know about that policy. El Chivo 2 (talk) 17:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)