User talk:Eleland/Response to accusations of Wikipedia's anti-Israel bias

Wow, how can anyone accuse Wiki of bashing Israel. Every time someone inserts a factual edit mentioning the occupation, they have to work for an hour to make sure that it stays in even in the most whittled, watered, glossed form.LamaLoLeshLa (talk) 20:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Only an hour? Geez, you've been pretty lucky so far. Typically it takes months... I mean we don't even have a page that is actually about the occupation. The closest thing is Israeli-occupied territories, which is supposedly about "one of a number of terms" used to refer to the OPT. Clear and uncontroversial issues in international law are presented as hotly contentious questions... "whether it is legitimate for Israel to annex portions of the territories," "whether Israel is legally an occupying power according to the Fourth Geneva Convention." It's crap. <eleland/talkedits> 09:23, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Misleading name of the assay

The name of this assay is simply misleading. There are numerous cases, where senior Wikipedians simply remove sourced facts from articles for political reasons as a way to discriminate against Jews and Israel. This behavior is in some cases granted by Wikipedia policies, in other cases simply by the majority of anti-Israeli Wikipedians.--AsiBakshish (talk) 14:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)