Elise.carreau

Your submission at Articles for creation: AGJA (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AGJA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 19:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Elise.carreau, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 19:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: AGJA (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:AGJA may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Acebulf (talk) 03:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Copyvio explanation

Hello,

Some content in the submitted article was copy-pasted from some of the references. According to the edit history comments, it was a list of names with titles. As it is a violation of copyright to have these included in the encyclopedia, the offending portions have been removed by an administrator, and the revision history has been deleted in order to remove all offending content from Wikipedia servers. As such, the article as it now stands does not include, as far as I can tell, any content in violation of copyright. If you believe that the article as it stands does not contain content in violation of copyright, feel free to resubmit and drop me a word on my talk page if you decide to do so, and I'll try to review it promptly. (It may, however, be reviewed by someone else in the mean time) Acebulf (talk) 18:36, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

From re-reading the article, I now see that the list of names with titles was not the problematic section, and was deemed to be adequate by an administrator. I don't recall exactly which section was problematic, but I can distinctly remember the content being a character-for-character (ie. copy-paste) from one of the websites listed as a source in the article. Acebulf (talk) 18:40, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: AGJA (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:AGJA may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 12:24, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Africa Group for Justice and Accountability (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToThAc was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Africa Group for Justice and Accountability and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Africa Group for Justice and Accountability, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToThAc (talk) 13:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The Africa Group for Justice and Accountability has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Africa Group for Justice and Accountability. Thanks! ToThAc (talk) 13:59, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Africa Group for Justice and Accountability has been accepted

Africa Group for Justice and Accountability, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Basie (talk) 02:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Declaring COI

Hi! I wanted to let you know I've placed a conflict of interest declaration at Talk:Africa_Group_for_Justice_and_Accountability since presumably you're the project manager of The Wayamo Foundation. I suggest also placing one on your user page. Let me know if you need help with how to do that. Do be careful when editing articles you're closely connected with (most of the time, you probably should avoid it). Cheers, Basie (talk) 03:07, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Declaring COI

Hello Basie, thanks for your feedback and comments. I think I will need help on how to place a conflict of interest declaration on my page, how should I proceed? About the AGJA article, edits should now come from other users is that correct? And I can only suggest them on this page right?: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Africa_Group_for_Justice_and_Accountability. Again, thank you for your patience and constructive feedback! Elise.carreau (talk) 13:17, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome, and thank you for engaging with us (it's not unusual for involved people to simply ignore attempts at dialogue!) Yes, that's the talk page to use for requested edits. To place a declaration on your talk page, click this link, copy paste the following text, and hit Publish changes (you can preview first if you like):

{{UserboxCOI|1=Africa Group for Justice and Accountability}}

That should do the trick. I will probably see any changes on the AGJA talk page and can respond to inquiries there, or just ask again here if you get stuck.

I should emphasize, none of this is considered punitive in any way! It's simply saying to other editors, "Hey, I might have a hard time being impartial because this is a project I care about". I completely understand your wanting to spread the word about what looks like very important work. Cheers, Basie (talk) 20:56, 14 June 2018 (UTC)