User talk:Elisesmith99/sandbox

Evaluating Articles - bullying

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? All details on bullying are relevant to the topic however where the word comes from stands out to me. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? the article is straight forward Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The viewpoint are defiantly overrepresented in each case. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? All links are reliable.  Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Many of these references are from other pages an books. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? From what I can see all information was basically from present day.  Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Many people asked how to deal with bullying or even if some editors where bullied. How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? because bullying is a way of judgment

   I decided to work on a section of freedom of expression. this topic is important to me because people lose sight of who they are trying to please other people. It is important for people to know their right to express themselves. I can add more on how much of a right this is as any other right. We have the right, but people are so judgmental they are afraid to show who they are.
   I find it that people are being bullied for how they are dressed, hw they wear their hair, and so on. most people are still being shames about being gay which causes other people you hide in the shadows. Our right as citizens is to be our own person without being shamed or bullied. I believe that does count as a hate crime as well and is very unnecessary. I also believe that this topic isn't visited enough or at all until someone commits suicide for being themselves.

Peer Review

I like the fact that you are so passionate about freedom of expression. Maybe you could elaborate even more on the importance of teaching people to be more accepting and less judgemental of others. And you could also give examples of currents events that have taken place in which people expressing themselves has lead to acts of violence or conflict. Deashiaterrell (talk) 05:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC)