Ellgee24
Ellgee24, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi Ellgee24! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brayton Purcell, LLP.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! EricEnfermero Howdy! 04:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
editPlease note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by AppleJack7Dear Princess Celestia... 00:33, 31 May 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Your submission at Articles for creation
editThe article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
AppleJack7Dear Princess Celestia... 00:22, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Welcome!
editWelcome to the Teahouse Badge | |
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. |
jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, I reverted your removal of well-referenced information from the article. If you are connected with this law firm, I suggest that you read conflict of interest. It may be that the article as currently written places undue weight on a single case. But it is not appropriate to remove well-referenced content without discussion or an explanation. Expansion of the article in compliance with policies and guidelines is the best solution. I know that you are new to Wikipedia, but you have to understand that we are here to build a neutral, well referenced encyclopedia. We don't host promotional articles about law firms or any other businesses. Once you introduced the topic to Wikipedia, you opened up the article to editing by anyone, anywhere, who wants to edit the article in compliance with our policies and guidelines. Feel free to ask questions on my talk page. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)