Your submission at Articles for creation: Serimax (June 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, EmStoBien! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Serimax (August 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 20:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello Greenman, please may you advise why this page is COI, thank you. EmStoBien (talk) 07:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Serimax has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Serimax. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I see but it's just how they are referred to in the industry, I have removed any adjective that is considered "marketing". Thanks for your time. EmStoBien (talk) 08:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Serimax (August 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Serimax (September 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 00:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit
 

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:EmStoBien, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=EmStoBien|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 06:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit
 

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 15:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Serimax (January 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 15:24, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Serimax

edit

  Hello, EmStoBien. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Serimax, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Serimax

edit
 

Hello, EmStoBien. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Serimax".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:26, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Draft:Serimax

edit
 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Serimax has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. UtherSRG (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply