Emdec
Welcome
editHello, Emdec, welcome to Wikipedia.
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
Again, welcome! —Plato
Mumbles - Swansea Railway
editI've reverted Rail transport in Great Britain. I think you would be better putting your link into History of rail transport in Great Britain or just possibly Rail transport in Great Britain#Brief history and overview. I do not think it should be elevated to the second sentence of the article. --Tagishsimon
- I charged you with vandalism when I saw the edit with "first railway, 1907". Later you changed that to 1807. The rest of my comment remains: the fact that the first passenger railway charter was given in 1807 is not imo so noteworthy as to be the second sentence in the article. If you do not like edits being reverted, and if you do not like questions of vandalism being raised when you enter bogus information like the 1907 factoid, then, well... Meanwhile, please remember to sign your posts on talk pages; thank you. --Tagishsimon
- It is significant. It is not so significant that it justifies the second sentence in the Rail transport in Great Britain article, is all. And at the point that I looked at it and saw the nonsense 1907 date, it looked like vandalism. I took the trouble to explain my concerns on your talk page and to suggest other places that you could post the fact. Calm down; you appear to be about as abraisive as me, and thus this is merely the pot calling the kettle black. And, for the record, I've done many more edits on that page than you, and thus, sadly, could be termed a railway enthusiast. --Tagishsimon
- Phew. --Tagishsimon
I agree with the comment about the positioning, but that was a bit of a harsh response. However, as a consequence I've updated the article that was linked to (and given it what I thought was a more appropriate name, together with a couple of redirects should people attempt to search for it with other names) and added it to the Timeline of railway history. Plus, it will help me with my task of documenting the Industrial Revolution in a more comprehensive manner. Thanks for creating the article, which was a big gap to be filled! [[User:Noisy|Noisy | Talk]] 19:42, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Ways to improve FOYD - Friends of the Young Disabled
editHi, I'm Abhishek191288. Emdec, thanks for creating FOYD - Friends of the Young Disabled!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add some secondary, reliable and verifiable sources to the article for verification.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. — Abhishek Talk 17:05, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
I have added three references. Hope this is ok. Emdec (talk) 17:49, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
edit
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Friends of the Young Disabled, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — Abhishek Talk 18:04, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Sorry - finger trouble or maybe brain trouble. Age does not come alone! Emdec (talk) 18:10, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
editHi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.
The article Friends of the Young Disabled has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence of independent notability. All the sources are primary. I can't see any secondary sources online to prove the charity is widely enough known to meet WP:NONPROFIT.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sionk (talk) 19:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)