Emlec
Welcome!
editHello, Emlec, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Scottyoak2 (talk) 22:11, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Suggestions: Your first article
editHere are some links to policies and guidelines that will guide you with your proposed biographical article:
- Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
- Wikipedia:Plain and simple#Creating and editing articles
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing
- Wikipedia:Your first article
- Wikipedia:Articles for creation
- Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
- Wikipedia:Notability (people)
- Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons
- Wikipedia:Citing sources
If you have questions about any of those articles, or if you want more specific help, stop by the Teahouse or Wikipedia's live help channel to ask someone for assistance. Scottyoak2 (talk) 22:24, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
How to write articles that won't be rejected or deleted
editIf you're going to write an article about anyone or anything that is not you or something you are connected to, here are the steps you should follow:
- 1) Choose a topic whose notability is attested by discussions of it in several reliable independent sources.
- 2) Gather as many professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources you can find. Google Books is a good resource for this. Also, while search engine results are not sources, they are where you can find sources. Just remember that they need to be professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources.
- 3) Focus on just the ones that are not dependent upon or affiliated with the subject, but still specifically about the subject and providing in-depth coverage (not passing mentions). If you do not have at least three such sources, the subject is not yet notable and trying to write an article at this point will only fail.
- 4) Summarize those sources left after step 3, adding citations at the end of them. You'll want to do this in a program with little/no formatting, like Microsoft Notepad or Notepad++, and not in something like Microsoft Word or LibreOffice Writer. Make sure this summary is just bare statement of facts, phrased in a way that even someone who hates the subject can agree with.
- 5) Combine overlapping summaries (without arriving at new statements that no individual source supports) where possible, repeating citations as needed.
- 6) Paraphrase the whole thing just to be extra sure you've avoided any copyright violations or plagiarism.
- 7) Use the Article wizard to post this draft and wait for approval.
- 8) Expand the article using sources you put aside in step 3 (but make sure they don't make up more than half the sources for the article, and make sure that affiliated sources don't make up more than half of that).
Doing something besides those steps typically results in the article not being approved, or even in its deletion.
If you are writing about yourself, or someone or something you are connected with (such as a friend, family member, or your business), the following steps are different:
- 1) If the subject really was notable, you wouldn't need to write the article. Remember that articles are owned by the Wikipedia community as a whole, not the article subject or the article author. If you do not want other people to write about you, then starting an article about yourself is a bad idea.
- 8a) If the article is accepted, never edit it again. Instead, make edit requests on the article's talk page.
- 8b) If the article is rejected, there will be a reason given. Read it carefully and closely. If there are links in the reason, open them and read those pages.
Ian.thomson (talk) 21:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- See WP:REFB for instructions on how to add citations. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Draft:Diane Orentlicher
editContent you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.wcl.american.edu/community/faculty/cv/orentlic/, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:07, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Emlec. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Diane Orentlicher.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:38, 16 August 2019 (UTC)