EmperorJimmu
Welcome!
edit
Hello, EmperorJimmu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
- Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 09:36, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
BLP Discretionary Sanctions alert
edit
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.January 2017
edit
This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 16:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, i think i know the reason you have warned me for this, I usually try to avoid anything that could be considered libel or defamatory but i know some things can slip through. I do not mean at all for anything i post to be defamatory, but it really seems like 'assuming good faith' has gone out the window for me. To my knowledge i did not say anything that was false, but I will be more careful in the future to avoid saying things that could be considered defamatory. EmperorJimmu (talk) 23:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- If you reviewed the history of that talkpage and if you could see some of the things that have had to be deleted from the talkpage, you'd understand why folks are quick to confront some lines of editing. Just be careful, avoid speculation and stick to published reliable sources. Acroterion (talk) 23:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- The very act of giving you a warning is an assumption of good faith. It assumes that the edit you made that violated our policies was a good-faith mistake and that you will not make it again.
- On an unrelated note, it might be a good idea for you to make some edits that have nothing to do with recent political topics. Are there any sports you like? Or rock music? I'm guessing from your username that you have at least something to offer those areas of our project that are currently being woefully neglected. As I am sure you have noticed, accounts that are registered and make one fairly precocious edit, then disappear for two months before coming back and making a bunch of edits exclusively to topics that are infamous for attracting single-purpose accounts are not likely to be treated with kid-gloves for very long.
- Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 05:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)