Emu-lmao
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
editHere are a few links you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nicely with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here! Best, Hagerman(talk) 01:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
July 2008
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Zophar's Domain appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Nar Matteru (talk) 00:40, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- I require an actual reason for this supposed bias, my entry clearly only states facts based on available resources related to the time period. Unless this comment is being made purely based on my comments. In which case, I wish to challenge those comments as well, since those seem mighty accurate as well. EMU-LMAO (talk) 23:40, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- A. Explaining the obvious, while information showing certain users in a negative light is not bias in itself, when half the page already consists of that (including another instance of selective quoting by yourself already above it) the page is not NPOV.
- B. When your stated Goal in the edit summary is to present a certain POV, I can no longer Assume Good Faith and must question your edits.
- C. Your source was supposedly an archive of their website hosted on your website, which definitely, definitely, is not a Reliable Source and automatically implies bias simply because of your ownership of it.
- You are definitely free to request mediation or attempt to establish consensus for these edits on the talk page, but if you readd them without consensus, I will redelete them and seek mediation myself if it heads towards 3RR and edit warring. Nar Matteru (talk) 23:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)