Welcome!

edit
 
Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Enhazaam, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Netanel Korin to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liancetalk 21:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emanuel Milman has been accepted

edit
 
Emanuel Milman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 02:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much! I'm really happy!! Can you also go over three other drafts I wrote? Even if you don't publish them, at least give me comments. Enhazaam (talk) 07:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Enhazaam (talk) 07:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rotem Oshman (June 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Enhazaam! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus has been accepted

edit
 
Tzipi Horowitz-Kraus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 00:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

reply

edit

He's clearly notable, but what you wrote was a poorly sourced hagiography, rather than a a neutral encyclopaedia article. When you write about a person

  • you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
  • You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
  • There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
  • You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Much of your text consists of opinions rather than verifiable facts, and doesn't alway confirm the claimed facts. For example, your paragraph David Goodblatt died on September 25, 2019, after being struck by a vehicle during his morning walk. He is survived by his wife Sasona, their children Keren, Michael, and Grace, and granddaughter Logan. Goodblatt was known for his nurturing nature, often sharing moments of warmth and encouragement with his students and colleagues. He left a lasting legacy in both his academic field and his community is sourced to comments made by friends and family on a legacy site. I'd be interested to know why you consider that a reputable, independent third-party source. Also, it doesn't confirm any of the claimed facts in the first sentence, and his character is irrelevant to his notablity. Saying how wonderful he was and attributing to friend and family comments on an obituary page is just flim-flam.

Similarly, your claim His scholarship significantly advanced the understanding of Jewish self-governance and nationalism in antiquity has three sources, none of which is an independent third-party sources, and none of which say what you claim, which would only be an opinion anyway. Everything is renowned, excelled, prestigious and so on.

If you think you can write this with proper sources and verified facts, and without the "He was wonderful" stuff, let me know and I'll sandbox it for you. Incidentally, books don't need references but should have an isbn Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:27, 25 June 2024 (UTC) a similar tone applies throughout, Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources.Reply

I understand, can you move it to sandbox? Enhazaam (talk) 06:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noah Hacham (June 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flemmish Nietzsche was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 13:35, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noah Hacham (July 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:36, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zeev Rotstein (July 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zeev Rotstein (July 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Youknowwhoistheman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Youknow? (talk) 16:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Netanel Korin (July 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ldm1954 (talk) 00:58, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Tarif Bader

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tarif Bader, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Enhazaam. Thank you for your work on Tarif Bader. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Tarif Bader

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tarif Bader, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ehud Lehrer (September 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meir Bar-Asher has been accepted

edit
 
Meir Bar-Asher, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:07, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics

edit

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Forced Islamization of the Samaritans

edit
 

Thank you for your interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption, a special set of rules apply to anyone editing in this topic area. Specifically, only extended confirmed editors are allowed to make direct edits and page creations to this topic area. Since you currently do not meet the requirements to contribute to this topic area, the page you created has been nominated for speedy deletion under G5.

If you think this page does not fall under the general sanctions described, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally you may wish to read about the topic restrictions here. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ely Schiller moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Ely Schiller. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello
Thank you so much, i saw it was speedy deleted but couldn't understand why and why someone did it like that without explaining. So thanks for saving the article, i'll work on it and make it better. Have a nice day Enhazaam (talk) 06:15, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ely Schiller has been accepted

edit
 
Ely Schiller, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurvat Mi'ar (October 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tavantius (talk) 15:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply