Ergbert

Replies to messages left on this page will also go on this page unless you request a reply be put on your talk page.

Welcome messages

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 02:31, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello Ergbert, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- (originally placed on User:Ergbert at 06:14, 4 November 2005 by User:Rex071404)

RTT edits

Hi! Your interest in the RTT article is very appreciated! However, the edits you've made, with the intention of making section more NPOV, is by some of us considered to be POV in themselves. I have attempted to re-include some information you deleted as well as keeping your changes while changing both the old and new to more NPOV. It is a challanging balance to both keep information while retaining NPOV, and feedback would be appreciated! If you're planning on making large edits to the article, I (and we) would appreciate it if you first discussed your thougts and suggestions on the article's talk page so as to allow a discussion beforehand. This would avoid heated sentiments and revert conflicts. Thanks! Mikademus 08:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Lightsaber

Sorry for the confusion. I was fixing one bit while breaking another.
brenneman^(t)(c) 05:28, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

I'm sorry, too. (S)He got the vandalism in between the time I went to revert and when I saved the page. I did see the vandalism, but thought it would get removed when I reverted. Then he got more vandalism in and there were more reverts as I reverted again, and then he did some talk page vandalism while I pointed out his last vandalism, too...Ergbert 05:39, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

69.134.149.145

This guy is really persistent. I would suggest you just let the page stay blanked for now. If you think it's serious enough to warrant a block, you could list it on admin intervention. - Orioneight 02:04, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

I was going to slow down on the reverts in case he'd(?) get bored without immediate responses, but I got involved with something else and managed to forget about this in the past fifty minutes. :D I'm reverting again now...If he's still around and ready to blank the page I think I'll just leave it alone for a while longer. Ergbert 02:54, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

By the way, thanks for reverting the blankings of my talk page! Solver 15:52, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Your Edit of Rogers' Rangers

Ergbert:

Regarding your edit for "Rogers' Rangers." The proper name of this unit is "Rogers' Rangers." That is the historically accurate, correct English title. Please do not edit this article to change the placement of the apostrophe or add an extra "s." The name of the commander was Robert Rogers and not Robert Roger; hence, Rogers' Rangers.

Thanks! (message from User:Flask on 19 November 2005)

Exactly. The possessive form of Rogers is Rogers's. Rogers' is plural possessive for several people named Roger. Ergbert 21:17, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Age of the Earth

I'm on Wikivacation, just wanted to let you know before I leave someone responded to you there. - RoyBoy ⁸⁰⁰ 15:26, 23 December 2005 (UTC) (originally placed on User:Ergbert)

Thanks for letting me know. Ergbert 02:35, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Camouflage Peer Review

Hello, you once edited Camouflage. You might be interested to know, this article has been nominated for peer peer review. novacatz 03:41, 24 December 2005 (UTC) (originally placed on User:Ergbert)

Comment on Battle Rifle Page

Ergbert, 

I was browsing through Wikipedia and came across your page. [1] I have nothing to complain about whith the content you placed on it, but have a sugestion. The term "Battle Rifle" also refers to a type of human weapon in the fictional Microsoft game Halo 2. I am very new to this Wikipedia talk page. I just recently got my account. If you don't take any offence and want to update your page, mabey you (or you could instruct me how to) put a link that would tell users about this side meaning.

        THanks for your time 
                             BrettidBrettid 02:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:60mmETC.PNG

File:60mmETC.PNG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:60mmETC.PNG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:60mmETC.PNG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:39, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)