Erianisbest

Your image Volcano.JPG. Nice image. Do not hurry too much. What is the Francisco scale? Reference? I think it is 4th, Taupo, effusive, 4rth class 9vei 7-80, should be 4th class (vei 7-8). If the 4th class includes VEI 8, why a 5th class with VEI 8 too? Mt. St. Hellens, Pinatubo, Tambora have a space before, the others do not. Names have capitals. VEI 8 is ten times VEI 7. Tambora, Pinatubo, cool the climate down, something like a "Year without Summer". VEI 8 cools down the climate around a decade long. If the climate is not at the beginning of an ice age nothing more happens, probably. Effusive eruptions are dangerous too, molten lava is a danger. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 14:17, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:The last visit.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The last visit.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:04, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mt.pulombato.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mt.pulombato.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 11:14, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Pulong batotsd.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Pulong batotsd.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 04:57, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Volcano intensity (Francisco's scale).jpg

The file File:Volcano intensity (Francisco's scale).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Low-quality jpg chart of info that's already contained in Volcanic Explosivity Index. Horribly unreadable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)