User talk:Esperant/2013 Archive

Proposed deletion of Armed With Anger Records

The article Armed With Anger Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No inherent notability, as per WP:ORGIN

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 20:56, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Swinburne University and advertorial cruft

Hi Esperant.

Thank you very much for your efforts at cleaning up advertorial material from the Swinburne University of Technology article: you improved the article by removing a significant amount of cruft. Today, I removed another 20 kilobytes of cruft. I would like to suggest an additional tip or two, if I might.

If a sentence seems like it may or may not be advertising, assume it's advertising. :) Some example sentences:

• "Students can study in the areas of commerce, engineering and technology, information and communication technologies, aviation, arts and social sciences, sustainability, digital media and many more." The entire sentence is advertising, and the phrase "many more" is a common phrase used in advertising.

• "The Prahran campus is known as Swinburne’s ‘creative campus’ and is located right in the heart of cosmopolitan Prahran." Most of the sentence is advertising. The terms "right in the heart of" and "cosmopolitan" are types of phrases that advertisers like to use.

I have dealt with the examples I've cited above.

If you reply, please first move the entire conversation to my talk page. If I reply to you, I can do the same.

Cheers! —Unforgettableid (talk) 20:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

thank you and apologies

Nullarbor - and the cultural thing - my apology that I just reverted without speaking with you - it was like an OR section - have added the redex trial refs - the other section will have some added refs... thanbks for reminding me about the section sorry about retrospective addition. satusuro 08:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)