Welcome!

Hello, Etienne GALLIAND, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bibliodiversity, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DeVerm (talk) 21:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bibliodiversity

edit
 

The article Bibliodiversity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia:NOTDICT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DeVerm (talk) 21:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Hi Etienne, if you are set to keep the Bibliodiversity article on the English Wikipedia, you must understand that each language version has their own guidelines for what can be included and what not. So being accepted on the Spanish or French Wikipedia, doesn't automatically mean that the article is also accepted on the English Wikipedia. I am going to put some tags on the article; if you address those you have a solid chance that the article will be kept (I will not bring it forward for deletion if you take care of these points) while improving the article. It would also help if more editors get involved with it so if you know others, ask them to help you in the effort. --DeVerm (talk) 14:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC).Reply
  • Hi DeVerm. I just read your message. I understand, of course, that each version of Wikipedia has its own rules; but the fact that the article exists on other languages (and was fully accepted) can't play against an english version either, don't you think so? By the way, I will read carefully your tags, and try my best to improve the article. But, please, give me some time: I am not always on line. All the best. Etienne Etienne GALLIAND (talk) 18:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Regarding a possible "conflict of interest", I can assure you that my involvement for the protection and promotion of the bibliodiversity is totaly non profitable! I added a sentence on my profil just to precise this point. Maybe it wasn't clear enough. Etienne GALLIAND (talk) 18:17, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply