User talk:Etrigan/Archives 1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by EdwardsBot in topic The Signpost: 15 October 2012


"Removal criterion"

Hi Etrigan,I see that you have restored the editorial tags in European winter storms of 2009–2010, apparently because you feel that they are necessary to prevent removal of the article. Please note that none of the "problems" pointed out by the tags are grounds for deletion; and in any case the tags themselves do not solve the problems, nor do they make it more likely that they will be solved. On the other hand, there is a basic rule in Wikipedia saying that any comments or requests *about* an article should be made on its Talk page, *never* on the article itself. The habit of sticking editorial-comment tags in the articles was started by a small number of editors, and was never a "consensus" in any meaningful sense of the word (in spite of whatever the tag designers may claim). The habit became widespread only because editorial tagging (with robot aid) are an easy way for one editor to "piss on the pole" of thousands of articles, without having to type anything or to think more than one second about each. It certainly has a huge impact on Wikipedia and is therefore extremely gratifying for the tagger's ego — just like e-mail spam, graffiti, and other forms of vandalism.
In any case, editorial tags in articles violate another basic rule of Wikipedia, "use your best judgement". Just look at the article with the tags, the article without the tags, and try to decide which one is the better version. All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 13:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

I've logged in and for some reason being associated with someone who has caused damaged/vanalism. I can only assume this is related to IP addresses? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.205.229 (talk) 09:32, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

what incorrect information did I introduce that you are threatening to ban me for? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.106.116.233 (talk) 17:22, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Blair Lekstrom

Just to let you know, 142's changes to Blair Lekstrom earlier today weren't vandalism; while there was admittedly a minor formatting problem with one of the references, Mr. Lekstrom in fact did quit his party to sit as an independent MLA this morning. Bearcat (talk) 17:24, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

the link is from the globe and mail: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/bc-liberal-resigns-over-hst/article1600882/

the legislature's website will take some time before it updates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.106.116.233 (talk) 17:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Apeejay School, Faridabad, Haryana

Hello Etrigan, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Apeejay School, Faridabad, Haryana, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to schools. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Theleftorium (talk) 11:25, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

commentary? Anchor baby?

Thats all the article is is political commentary, I dont care how many references you post. You cant even define immigration "reductionist". What a load of crap.

I dont have to reason with some 3rd year english major. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.186.227 (talk) 08:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

I have no interest at all in the subject matter. In fact, I don't even know much about it, not living in the United States. However, I do know a bit about Wikipedia policy, and your edits were a clear violation of Wikipedia's policy of neutral point of view. It's not a soapbox I'm afraid. Etrigan (talk) 08:53, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of BS/2

Hi there,

Just a quick note to say that I removed your G4 speedy tag from this article and replaced it with a G11. G4 should only be used for articles that were previously deleted by a discussion at WP:AFD - not for articles that were previously speedy deleted (like this one) or prodded. Of course I agree with you that this article should be deleted, this is just a courtesy note to explain why I switched the tag.

Yes, I realize this is like checking for UL labels on the deckchairs on the Titanic :)

Thparkth (talk) 11:52, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

No problems, I'll be sure to get it right next time. I'm getting the feeling this one's going to need WP:SALTed in due course though... Etrigan (talk) 12:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Permissions

Hey, I've just granted you the reviewer right, but having had a browse through your contributions, I wondered if you'd like rollback rights? Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:19, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! I wouldn't say no, if only to have an extra weapon in the armory. I'm a pretty heavy Twinkle user but there are situations when it's a) slow and b) annoying. So yes, if you're happy to grant rollback rights I'm happy to have them. Etrigan (talk) 21:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done :). It's faster than Twinkle for a straight revert (handy if you completely cock up an edit on the Main Page, not that I've ever done that :S). I'll drop you the template so you have "The RulesTM":
 

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

--Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:14, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Lightning Swords of Death

I've contested your nomination for speedy deletion of Lightning Swords of Death, expanded it's lead, and included references...Have another look at it. rzrscm (talk) 23:25, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Great - the better the article the better. I don't take part in the deletion process (as I think it's unfair for me to nominate and actually do that) but I'd guess the article is still at risk. The most important thing you can do to make sure it doesn't get deleted is make sure the article passes the Notability policy - have they won something? Had a single or album in the charts? You can see the other criteria. Make sure you mention all that fit and back it up with references and it'll be fine. All the best! Etrigan (talk) 07:19, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

/* Political ties */

In regards to the Ekal Vidyalaya page that I created:

Some users are citing information from radical political websites. They are biased and do not represent our organization. Ekal Vidyalaya is a secular organization and has no religious ties. Neither does it have political ties.

How do I either remove the biases or remove the Ekal Vidyalaya page that I created?

Thanks.

(Mhl397 (talk) 05:59, 15 June 2010 (UTC))

Hey there - the best thing to do is to counter them by the addition of clear, well-written rebuttal, backed up with citations from reliable sources. By doing that, you can alter the tone of the overall article. All the very best! Etrigan (talk) 07:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

why do u delete my page???

it is true.... i have not breached the laws so let it be —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pumpum123 (talkcontribs) 09:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Hey - it's not just your page. It's everybody's to edit. And there are some policies on Wikipedia in order to get the best quality articles - edits that don't match those policies are likely to be reverted. You might want to take a look at WP:NPOV and WP:CITE in particular - basically, edits of factual information have to be backed up with references to external sources, and the language used in edits has to be neutral. I think that's why the page will continue to be edited - in order to maintain the page's adherence to these policies. Feel free to improve it if you can stick to the policies though! Etrigan (talk) 09:42, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Keren Hanan

Hello, I've removed the speedy from Keren Hanan, as the article asserts notability. There are still some apparent copyright issues, however. Thanks, Empty Buffer (talk) 07:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion - Maximuscle

Hi Etrigan, thanks for your note just now, I would love if you can please point me in right direction as to why the page was deleted so quickly. We have had a number of requests from our customers to add a page on Wikipedia including our history and ambassadors so this is not a form of advertising - if you can please guide me especially with regards to the references that would be most useful, Thanks Anderson —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sam-anderson-mm (talkcontribs) 17:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Gareth Loy

Please review beating the newbie. Your premise in continually adding template tags is that it will "help attract other editors to clean up." This is nonsense-- the tags will just sit there, and suddenly you become some kind of armchair critic, trying to drive our work! You know, we don't care if this or any other article makes it through your lens-- delete it if you wish, we are volunteers working just to make Wiki sounder. Look at the thousands of articles with tags all over them-- no one but those who are writing the articles are "attracted" to "make them better." I think I like YOUR role better, to simply keep tagging the work of others. Why waste days of research when you and others just scrap the work and add tags, but add no original citations themselves? You are encouraging editing wars, why not look that up?

You speedy deletion tag to Jo Luck

I contested it, and explained why on the talk page. Minimac (talk) 07:56, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

John O. Merrill

John O. Merrill is not an appropriate article for the speedy deletion process. --Tenmei (talk) 23:54, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Justification

The burden of research supports the notability of John O. Merrill; and the following is sufficient to rebut any "speedy deletion" argument. In summary, the notability of John O. Merrill is verified by reliable sources: (a) the obit in the New York Times, (b) the article in the Grove Art Online, (c) the article in the American National Biography and (d) WorldCat Identities ... plus (e) the previously mentioned but unused article in the Britannica online.

Notes
^ a b c d e f g h "John Merrill Sr., Architect, Dead," New York Times. June 13, 1975.
^ a b Museum of Modern Art (MOMA): SOM citing Richard Guy Wilson (2009). Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press.
^ "Merrill, John Ogden," (1999). American National Biography, Vol. 15, pp. 360-361.
^ a b c d Lehman College Art Gallery, Skidmore, Owings and Merrill (SOM), Merrill bio notes
^ Westcott, Ed. (2005). Oak Ridge, p. 61., p. 61, at Google Books
^ Nauman, Robert Allen. (2004). On the Wings of Modernism: the United States Air Force Academy, pp. 72-80., p. 72, at Google Books
^ Wilkes, Joseph A. and Robert T. Packard. (1989). Encyclopedia of Architecture: Design, Engineering & Construction, Vol. 4. p. 454.
^ "Radical Design Dropped For Air Academy Chapel," New York Times. July 4, 1955.
^ "Residential Work Rising in Chicago," New York Times. February 14, 1937.
^ "Name Consultants for Building Code," New York Times. March 26, 1950.
^ American Institute of Architects Historical Directory, Merrill, ahd1030138
^ a b WorldCat Identities: Merrill, John O.
References
  • Nauman, Robert Allen. (2004). On the Wings of Modernism: the United States Air Force Academy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 10-ISBN 0252028910/13-ISBN 9780252028915; OCLC 52542599
  • Westcott, Ed. (2005). Oak Ridge. Charleston, South Carolina: Arcadia Publishing. 10-ISBN 0738541702; 13-ISBN 9780738541709; OCLC 62511041
  • Wilkes, Joseph A. and Robert T. Packard. (1989). Encyclopedia of Architecture: Design, Engineering & Construction. New York: John Wiley. 10-ISBN 0471633518/13-ISBN 9780471633518; OCLC 300305038

The article text explains that John O. Merrill is

  1. Notable for design and development of the US Air Force Academy campus; and he provided on-site architect construction oversight for the project in Colorado Springs, Colorado
  2. Notable for design and development of the Manhattan Project research campus; and he provided on-site architect construction oversight for the project and for the new community which was created at Oak Ridge, Tennessee
  3. Notable for design, development and construction of the permanent US military facilities on Okinawa, including the still controversial Kadena Air Force Base
  4. Notable as a founding partner of the prominent international architectural firm, Skidmore, Owings and Merrill (SOM); and also notable for his seminal influence on development of unique SOM corporate culture

I'm impressed - certainly have another go at re-doing the article, I don't think it's restricted from re-creation. Perhaps a suggestion? If you get the article into nearly finished form in your sandbox, so that as soon as you re-create the main article it looks complete? Work-in-progress articles are much more likely to be deleted than finished ones. I see from your talk page that FT2 has suggested pretty much the same thing. All the very best, Etrigan (talk) 07:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Gary Lilien

Hello Etrigan. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Gary Lilien, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Distinguished Research Prof at Penn State U plus three honorary doctorates is certainly enough to pass A7. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 16:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

No worries. That one was a bit over-enthusiastic of me, in retrospect :) Etrigan (talk) 16:57, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Break Media

Hello Etrigan, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Break Media, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Theleftorium (talk) 19:29, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Also note that the article includes a reliable source discussing the subject: http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2010-03-17-break17_ST_N.htm. Theleftorium (talk) 19:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Precisely where in the article? I can't see it . It is referenced, but without some statement of notability in the body surely CSD is appropriate? I refer from A7: an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. Etrigan (talk) 19:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Owning notable websites such as Break.com and FileFront is surely an indication of importance. Theleftorium (talk) 19:37, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
No, that's like saying I'm notable because I own a famous painting - the "No inherent notability" part of WP:ORG is relevant. Nor is there depth of coverage: the article fails WP:SIGCOV too. With only one source and no (necessary) assertion of importance, it's still an A7 to me. Etrigan (talk) 19:46, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Oh, and A7 is clear: it has to say why it's important. Your assumption it is because of its media properties is not relevant to A7, no? Etrigan (talk) 19:49, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
(ec) A7 isn't about notability so WP:ORG and WP:SIGCOV don't apply here. AfD or PROD would be more appropriate in a case like this. Theleftorium (talk) 19:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
I will do that. Etrigan (talk) 19:56, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Okay I've added to the article. (Obviously I think that the article is notable.) I only added content from one source, but I've added a few more useful sources to the article's "Further reading" section. Gary King (talk) 20:56, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Duncan Lunan

(Hey, you left an unsigned comment! BAAAAAD man!) ;o)

McMarcoP (talk) 10:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm surprised SineBot didn't catch it :) I was more worried about leaving a bad joke! Etrigan (talk) 12:51, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
It was not even that bad, 'm'on! ;o) (yes, OK, it kinda was) McMarcoP (talk) 12:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Username

My username Ayusuits is my nickname, though it is far from my original name. Most of my friends call me that. Should I change it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayusuits (talkcontribs) 10:51, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

In that case, no :) Etrigan (talk) 12:50, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Tracy Negoshian

I have removed the advert from Tracy Negoshian because the article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. I have also removed lead too short after editing, as it is consistent with other individuals' biographies who are fashion designers. I have made significant edits to this article, as well added some references. I hope you agree that it is better than originally submitted. Clothesed (talk) 19:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Would you mind if I took an edit at it, to have a go at trying to make it sound more like an encyclopedia article? Etrigan (talk) 22:33, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010

The Signpost: 16 August 2010

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


The Signpost: 3 October 2011

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

The Signpost: 7 November2011

The Signpost: 14 November 2011

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 15 October 2012