User talk:EurekaLott/Archive13
This is an archive of past discussions with User:EurekaLott. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
New Wikiproject!
Hail and well met! I am dropping you a quick note because I have created a new Wikiproject - WikiProject Green Party to help expand and improve on the vast number of Green Party articles on Wikipedia! I hope you will consider joining so we can collaborate together! Have a great day! Me-123567-Me (talk) 00:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
- NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
- Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
- The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Cleveland Cavaliers uniforms
I'm a little confused. Why did you tag File:Composite Cleveland Cavaliers uniforms.png for deletion? How exactly is it WP:NONFREE? I don't get it. It's being used in the Cleveland Cavaliers article. I used NBA.com sources from the article to create the file. Sources from NBA.com are publicly accessible, IMO. Please explain. I just feel like every time I try to create a uniform file, you and other editors will tag it for deletion. I just don't understand why. Charlesaaronthompson (talk) 08:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
RFC notification
Due to your editorial involvement in {{Alice}}
I thought you might want to participate in the RFC at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates#RFC: Overhauling the Disney franchise templates for consistency.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:40, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
[[ File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]]
The article Richmond Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable, no sources
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Cleveland mall
OK, I understand that it is not technically a building or structure, but I am trying to narrow down the "year works" cat. What subcat would you but it in?--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 20:50, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, EurekaLott. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Just an FYI....
Hi, EL - Re: Hadrut Province - I'm trying to get Hadrut Region moved to Hadrut Province. I have already corresponded with the editor whose comment you restored. I don't make it a practice of reverting TP comments but in this case, it was ok. What we need is for an admin to delete Hadrut Province so I (or you) can move Hadrut Region w/its TP history to Hadrut Region. Please, can you help?? Atsme📞📧 18:39, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm not familiar enough with the subject to judge whether or not it's an uncontroversial move. If there is disagreement, your best option may be to remove the deletion request and start a WP:RM discussion on Talk:Hadrut Region. - Eureka Lott 18:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- No problem. There was no disagreement, it wasn't a controversial move - it was simply the same article with 2 different names, one of which was the wrong name. Ansh666 explained what template I should have used when a page is blocking a move - I'll know next time - all is good. Atsme📞📧 18:51, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Since you moved the article, I moved its associated talk page, so they didn't get split up. Thanks for the note. - Eureka Lott 18:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- No problem. There was no disagreement, it wasn't a controversial move - it was simply the same article with 2 different names, one of which was the wrong name. Ansh666 explained what template I should have used when a page is blocking a move - I'll know next time - all is good. Atsme📞📧 18:51, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
The name of the template is ambiguous; as you can see, I interpreted it to be a template of wikilinks to the tallest buildings currently in Cleveland listed by opening date, especially since the target article of the wikilink in the header did list the buildings in this manner. You can see why I thought that the omission of 200 Public Square was so glaring. I'm changing the wikilinking in the header to match the format at Template:Buildings in Chicago timeline. Mapsax (talk) 12:42, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Neighborhood article
I was wondering if you could do me a favor and take a look at the Glenville article as well as the Beachwood articles. There's an editor with an agenda who keeps adding the same redundant (and POV/unencyclopedic in tone, as well off topic in the Glenville instance) and I'm not getting through to the guy. I've left my reasoning on the talk page of the Beachwood in the past as well as explained my edits in the summary bar to no avail. Please have a look when you get the chance. Thank you. Ryecatcher773 (talk) 17:32, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Proposed move of Third Voice
Pleasae be aware I have proposed a move for the Third Voice article at Talk:Third Voice#Requested move 18 September 2018. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:08, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
"Motor Cycling (magazine0" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Motor Cycling (magazine0. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 16#Motor Cycling (magazine0 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 17:34, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, EurekaLott. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dmoz.org.png
Thanks for uploading File:Dmoz.org.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
War Zone(Crusade) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect War Zone(Crusade). Since you had some involvement with the War Zone(Crusade) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:41, 31 December 2018 (UTC)