Eva Kreiss

This is Eva Kreiss's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior – caesar (January 8)

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior – caesar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 13:49, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Eva Kreiss! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 13:49, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear Mattdaviesfsic,

You claimed that I did not provide reliable sources for my article. The institute the short article is about is an official Max Planck Research Institute of the prestigiuos Max Planck Society and I provided it's website and a press release. What kind of reliable source are you thinking of? The article also exists on the German Wikipedia and it was not a problem there. Please let me know what I can do to get this article published asap.

Best

Eva Eva Kreiss (talk) 07:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic