Evanherwijnen

Evanherwijnen, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Evanherwijnen! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Search for Hidden Particles (April 10)

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add additional citations/references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Search for Hidden Particles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Status and Advice

I apologize for not having explained sooner. If the material is indeed in the public domain you can use it, but this needs to be demonstrated. The main page of the website has a copyright notice, and in any case we assume any page without an explicit notice that it is in the public domain is copyright.

The easiest way to deal with it is to indicate on each page used that it is in the public domain (or under a CC:3.0-BY free license). Then on the article drat you need to indicate exactly what material is copied from each page. Alternatively you can send the necessary form according to the unfortunately rather complicated formalities at WP:DCM.

If urge you to do one or the other, as the material is otherwise very suitable . When ready, please notify me on my talk page and I will move it to article space. It will be best to notify me as particular, so it gets reviewed by someone who understands the importance. If you need a copy of the text as submitted, just notify me on my talk page. DGG ( talk ) 14:59, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic