Welcome!

Hello, Evanseinfeld! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! DVdm (talk) 21:28, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

November 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Auric. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Lupe Fuentes without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Auric talk 20:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Evanseinfeld, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited was Lupe Fuentes, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Auric talk 20:43, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Lupe Fuentes. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 21:13, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Note the cited source does not say that this was "a very positive news story". - DVdm (talk) 21:15, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Lupe Fuentes with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 21:24, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Note - the content that you removed with this edit was properly sourced. If you want to contest the validity of the source and the content, you need to go to the article talk page and discuss with the other editors to gain a wp:consensus about removing that content. - DVdm (talk) 21:27, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Your recent edits to User talk:Auric could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Auric talk 23:57, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I dont know how to chat here , is this CORRECT???? --Evanseinfeld (talk) 02:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

July 2014

edit

  Hello. I noticed that you removed sourced content from the Lupe Fuentes article. This does not appear to be constructive. I have reverted these edits and restored the content. • Gene93k (talk) 12:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

constructive edit removing inaccurate information.

edit

the reference to the artists actual homepage biography that was cited http://lupefuentes.com/about/ does not reference "pornographic actress". this was an incorrect edit, so it was changed. Also if you read the same bio, on the artists official homepage, there is no reference to singer or dancer, only producer and DJ. this is a constructive edit. Also i changed the photo to a recent picture from 2014, as for some reason the main photo was 5 years old and did not reflect how the person looks accurately in the present.

Speedy deletion nomination of Andre Voinigescu

edit
 

Please do not make articles about a living person that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blackguard 08:00, 5 August 2014 (UTC)Reply