Exazonk

Welcome!

Hello, Exazonk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Karmafist 01:19, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alan John Miller

A tag has been placed on Alan John Miller requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:49, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Australian Vaccination Network

You seem the most interested, can I recommend the following (since it seems to have been lost in the noise). Can I recommend that you have a look at Generation Rescue and put together a Table of Contents (ie/ list of headers) for use on the future article. You can place it on the article's talkpage (probably the best place) or here on your talkpage. Just somewhere where other editors can see it and edit/comment on it. Then begin to populate it. Go easy on the rhetoric though. And source everything. Shot info (talk) 06:18, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet Investigation

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Exazonk. Thank you. ThaddeusB (talk) 06:31, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing my typos and grammar errors. I appreciate it. --ThaddeusB (talk) 03:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

No worries. Thanks for all the good work that you have been doing. Exazonk (talk) 04:36, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Divine Truth

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Divine Truth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Divine Truth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Jarkeld (talk) 15:25, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

"rural to sub-tropical"

Rural is a description of population density and land usage and sub-tropical describes climate. So I don't see how this makes any sense. Editor2020 (talk) 17:46, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Reference errors on 9 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Meryl Dorey page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

AJ?

Hello there, my friend. Do you mind if I ask, are you AJ Miller? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.216.46.195 (talk) 14:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

You bring a smile to my face on this Monday morning. No I'm not AJ, I've never met the guy. I'm simply trying to provide information on him so that people can make informed decisions as his online presence isn't that big. Writing from a NPOV can be difficult sometimes though. I've also been accused of being Meryl Dorey.Exazonk (talk) 22:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

(Different IP but same person - I should really stop being lazy and register for an account lol) My apologies about the AJ accusation, buddy. Although there's nothing wrong with being AJ, if you were :) haha. As for Meryl Dorey, I only know about her through Wikipedia as I don't live in Australia so I don't hear your local news. She seems to be a rather militant anti-vaxer. Do you mind if I ask, just out of curiosity, where do you stand on that issue? Personally, I feel that some vaccines are a good idea and are good science but perhaps we are having too many and maybe we shouldn't be giving so many vaccines to children. After all, it's not exactly natural. But the question is, does everything really need to be natural? lol. Anyway, with regards to Divine Truth, I'm still a skeptic but I readily admit to having watched an estimated 200 hours or so of AJ Miller and Mary Luck. They're fascinating people, even if they turn out to be crazy (which I don't think they are, I think they're just really spiritual in a way that is different to most). Cheers, mate. - Troy

Wow, you have watched a lot of AJ's stuff. Since you have seen so much, what do you think of his Earth Change predictions? None of his predictions have come true? I'm also a very strong rationalist and thus I think there should be evidence for everything. The evidence shows that vaccines are extremely beneficial for society and we are far better off with them rather than without them. Sure, as a fit healthy person you may not notice any difference if you don't get a flu shot every year, but this doesn't mean that you are still not spreading the flu just because you have limited symptoms.14.202.63.56 (talk) 03:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello there! Yeah I've watched quite a lot, haha. You're right about the predictions not coming true. I thought the predictions were ridiculous anyway. Like I said, I'm still a skeptic. As for vaccines, yes they are helpful and they are good science, like I wrote in my previous comment, and I feel that perhaps if we're healthy people, we shouldn't need SO many of them? I guess I see myself as a "moderate" when it comes to vaccines. I would call myself pro-vaccine whilst still being cautious about their over-use. I'm not a fan of Meryl Dorey and I only heard about her from Wikipedia anyway as I don't live in Australia.I hope you don't mind but I'm always curious about the location of people I'm talking to so I looked up your IP address and you appear to be in beautiful Brisbane? :) Unless the IP location tools are inaccurate which they may be, haha. Can I ask, have you ever met AJ? Thanks. 90.197.10.25 (talk) 14:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC) Troy

This conversation is a bit clunky via my talk page. You can email me using my wiki username at our good friend Google.Exazonk (talk) 22:50, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Sidesurf position.jpg

The file File:Sidesurf position.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)