Exvoxmachina
Ah, screw it. This is why no one will ever take Wikipedia seriously.
Your editing
editI do not wish to upset you further but I really hate to see any contributor quit. I reverted your edits because you have not tried to reach a consensus after your initial edits were reverted by another user. I do not have any sort of personal problem with your editing abilities. I must say though your approach could use some work. I hope you decide to bring your concerns with the article to the talk page, as it is obvious you edit in good faith and just do not understand how it works around here. Regards - 4twenty42o (talk) 03:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- How, sir, do I reach a consensus? With the ONE editor who saw fit to address the issue on the talk page. I do find it interesting that so many Admins came out of the woodwork for one obscure page. Maybe if the Admins were so interested in seeing that the page remains "unvandalised" they should revert the page to its original content?
- "...just do not understand how it works around here" I, sir, am now aware exactly how it "works" around here.
- I am not aware of any admin involvement.. And I am most certainly not an admin. I reverted your reverts because while made in good faith were not made through a consensus after your initial edits were rejected. That leads to edit warring. Hence the vandalism template. I do not think that you are a vandal but I think that even good faith edits can be vandalism if made against consensus or serious objection. I do not wish to run you off or see you quit due to one negative night at the key board. Please do not be discouraged either by the bluntness of somethings on Wikipedia or disagreements amongst editors. I myself am dealing with silly issues related to our earlier disagreement. Please reconsider your decision to quit, I honestly do believe that once the guidelines are understood better your experiences here will improve greatly. - 4twenty42o (talk) 05:31, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello i would like to interject on this as you may or may not have seen that you were reciving warnings from other users and one from myself. I would first like to apologize about that as it was overlook to a false postive report as vandalism this does occasionally happen in software when being used to fight vandalism . Thus it seems that the warnings have been removed from your user page and shouldnt cause any problems. I hope you understand and i again do apologize about that.
-- Staffwaterboy Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments 06:20, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Tinsel Korry
editMary mother of Jesus you people are pretentious.