Eyescribe

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Eyescribe (talk · contribs) has been paid by Miziker Entertainment on behalf of Charlotte Huggins. User:eyescribe.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Eyescribe (talk · contribs) has been paid by Penske Media Corp.. User:eyescribe.

As of September 2019 I am a paid editor employed by Miziker Entertainment on behalf of Charlotte Huggins. I have been engaged to create pages for Miziker Entertainment and its principals Ryan Miziker, Ron Miziker and Charlotte Huggins.

I am also an employee of Penske Media Corp. and have used my Wikipedia account to edit the Variety Magazine page. My change was factual and backed up by citation. It was not done at my employer's direction. However, Variety may ask me to make further edits in the future. I will add a COI disclosure on each individual edit as required by Wikipedia's Terms of Use.

September 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Charlotte Huggins, from its old location at User:Eyescribe/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 13:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your help. Is there anything else I need to do to submit this page for review and publication? I thought I had hit the “Publish” button but did so from my sandbox. Eyescribe (talk) 04:47, 21 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Eyescribe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 13:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlotte Huggins (October 13)

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MurielMary were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A few issues here - 1, the article is overly long and detailed and includes a lot of trivia and irrelevant detail about her career. Therefore it's difficult to see how she meets the criteria for a biography on Wikipedia. 2. External links need to be removed. 3. IMDb is not a reliable source on Wikipedia, those citations need to be removed and replaced with something reliable. 4. The article needs inline citations to show where the claims in the article are from in the sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlotte Huggins and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Charlotte Huggins, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:23, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Eyescribe! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 10:23, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlotte Huggins (November 11)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are a lot of statements without any citation e.g the section on her early life, the first three paragraphs of the "special venue" section. These need to be referenced to a source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlotte Huggins and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Charlotte Huggins, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Charlotte Huggins

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Eyescribe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charlotte Huggins".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Charlotte Huggins

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Eyescribe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charlotte Huggins".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:43, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic