F1jmm
My page of discussion is there to accomodate you.
Cordially,--F1jmm (talk) 21:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC).
My memo pad
editDisambiguation link notification
editHi. When you recently edited Le Conquet radio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adieu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Adieu is French for farewell; in Occitan, the same word is both a farewell and a salutation. --F1jmm (talk) 11:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Email, Le Conquet Radio
editIt may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
I also left a message at User talk:France3470#Le Conquet radio. France3470 (talk) 23:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
editHi. When you recently edited Le Conquet radio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FFU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
editMessage added 13:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Radioamateur aviation Europe.
editGood day, Thank you for the correction. Best wishes. Tjlynnjr (talk) 07:53, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 20
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marine VHF radio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allemagne. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, F1jmm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, F1jmm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, F1jmm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editColourised images
editPlease do not add colourised images, as you did here. They constitute a form of original research, which has no place in an encyclopedia. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:17, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Colorized images
editHi. I appreciate all the work you've done on Commons. Your colorized photos look really well done, and are a valuable addition. But Wikipedia does not allow the use of colorized black & white historical photos in articles as here, see MOS:IMAGES. I think the idea is that the added color is original research, and readers should see the photos in their authentic historical state. Also, I feel we don't want to give uninformed readers the idea that color photography was the only kind there was, or that it was in use back in the 1800s. Thanks. --ChetvornoTALK 17:19, 14 September 2024 (UTC)