FactChecker18
Why have the changes made to this page been undone? They are factual and cited sources with no vandalism.
May 2018
editYour recent editing history at Shmuly Yanklowitz shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MPS1992 (talk) 22:15, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
FactChecker18, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi FactChecker18! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC) |
- I've responded to your question on Wikipedia:Teahouse. /Julle (talk) 18:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- There is a help desk question as well.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:44, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Guy (Help!) 11:11, 8 May 2018 (UTC)- JzG, I would encourage you to reconsider this block. Ok, FactChecker18 has violated the 3-revert rule and been warned for it, and his standard of referencing is questionable; but he is/was attempting to improve Wikipedia. (And while I know little of rabbinical issues, I judge that his edits to Shmuly Yanklowitz are/were constructive and favourable to the subject, but annoyed conservative believers.) Maproom (talk) 07:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)