October 2019

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bigil, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Begoon 11:55, 5 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Bigil. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to losing your editing privileges. Thank you. Begoon 12:15, 5 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Overlinking and indiscriminate awards

edit

Hi there, re: this edit, please don't add excessive and duplicate wikilinks as you did. See WP:OVERLINK. Links compete for reader attention, and too many links, especially when totally unnecessary, discourage readers from seeking other information.

Additionally, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. We are not here to log every award Vijay has received or every accomplishment. The world is full of award mills and Wikipedia only cares about the most significant information about a subject. The significance of something like an award is typically gauged by whether or not the award is notable, and our quick-check for notability is whether or not the award has an article that has endured long-lasting community scrutiny. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)Reply