Faus
Welcome!
Hello, Faus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Please do not be discouraged if your changes are removed. Keep editing. Most article introductions are pretty well thought out. You might want to discuss, on the talk page, any changes you intend to make to introductions. Look forward to working with you. Cliff (talk) 03:46, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Equality
editCategory:Equality, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Everything
editCategory:Everything, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:56, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Something
editCategory:Something, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
I am a little concerned about the addition of Category:Ethology to many categories, the introduction of Category:Everything and Category:Something, the removal of Category:Ontology from cats, the removal of Category:Fundamental from cats, and the insertion of your opinion into edit summaries. Anarchangel (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
In a positive or a negative sense? Because the categories Everything and Something were removed. You know that Wikipedia categories are a mess, like the rest of Wikipedia, and there doesn't seem to be any disposition from people to fix that. This finally discourages any person from contributing anything. Lately I don't feel like contributing anything, since on Wikipedia there are no serious prospects of progress at all. I'm finally understanding and assuming what Wikipedia really is, and what Wikipedia's real limitations are. And this realistic perspective kills a lot of serious but naive intentions I had in the past. Wikipedia's concept and methodology have already reached the best of themselves, and they won't go beyond. By the way, if you don't like any of my changes, just undo them if you want, I'll do nothing about that. --Faus (talk) 22:44, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- I edited out Ethology from a couple of cats. I think everything will be OK. I hear you about WP's limitations; I always end up coming back, though. Anarchangel (talk) 21:47, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia provides with a lot of useful terminology for searching and reference, I acknowledge this great advantage. It's about the lack of a consequent structure about term interrelations that I complain. You may have a lot of terminology, but if it is an unsorted chaos then you miss most of the utility you could get. Wikipedia provides with the terms, but it could provide as well with the true didactics, teaching and spread of knowledge that could derive from the suitable interrelations and arrangement among those terms, and it doesn't. An unsorted chaos of terminology may still help you acquire knowledge and understanding from other sources, but it doesn't provide with and it doesn't spread knowledge by itself. In providing with a chaotic terminology, Wikipedia helps you learn, but only that; it doesn't teach you. --Faus (talk) 22:25, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Category:Etiology has been nominated for renaming
edit
Category:Etiology has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:54, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Category:Form has been nominated for deletion
edit Category:Form has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Category:Form has been nominated for deletion
edit Category:Form has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)