Fazm1bico

Welcome!

Hello, Fazm1bico, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Bility (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2011 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Tomb Raider

Unless you can cite a source saying Tomb Raider (2011 video game) uses a "modified Crystal engine", then please do not add it again. Thank you. —Mike Allen 23:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Hey Fazm1bico, we really need sources for what game engine a title is using, especially for qualifiers and version numbers. If you can find reliable sources on that matter, then we can look at readding the info. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 18:27, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Once again, you need to read WP:V, WP:RS and WP:CITE. Your additions are just going to be removed otherwise. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:53, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Simply communicating would also be a big advantage to you right now. Rehevkor ✉ 22:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

I added a source that said the Tomb Raider reboot used the "Crystal Engine" (which is apparently new from Crystal Dynamics). Apparently this editor read it from the same place so I don't know why they couldn't have added the link between ref tags. Not that hard and could prevent him from being blocked after repeatedly adding "unsourced" content and not communicating. Are they doing the same for other articles, because I haven't noticed him or her editing the Tomb Raider article again. If so, do a google search of the 'engine' they are posting and see if a RS has it. Although the burden is on him or her--if they aren't talking back what else is there to do but keep reverting their changes? :-\ —Mike Allen 00:54, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Um does anyone else find this strange that this person has created an article on a video game engine called Video Reality. Then created articles for the games it has suppose used this Video Reality as the game engine. 20,000 Leagues: The Adventure Continues and Dark Side of the Moon: A Sci-Fi Adventure. The Video Reality is written like an advertisement, using quotes from the SouthPeak Games president, but has no sources at all. —Mike Allen 01:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

If this user really is the copyright holder of File:Video Reality.jpg then there's a conflict of interest. I'm more inclined to believe it's a simple copyright violation, however.

Copyright violations

• Actually Video Reality is a direct copy of this. I have tagged it for a speedy delete and I am going to look at the other articles they have created. Fazm1bico this is the perfect time to speak up, or there is no doubt you will be indefinitely blocked. —Mike Allen 01:17, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
• 20,000 Leagues: The Adventure Continues is a copy from here and here (which states "No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder"). —Mike Allen 01:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
• Dark Side of the Moon: A Sci-Fi Adventure is a direct copy from Gamespot and here. —Mike Allen 01:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
• Aura II: The Sacred Rings is a direct copy of this. —Mike Allen 01:51, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
• Aura: Fate of the Ages a copy of Amazon. —Mike Allen 02:07, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Temujincover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Temujincover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Denniss (talk) 20:34, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

ANI discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —Mike Allen 01:49, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

CopyVios

I'm sure you're getting frustrated with all of the warnings and whatnot. To put it simply, even if you remove the content that is considered a copyright violation, do not remove the template. When an admin comes to page because of the template, they will check whether it is actually still a copyright violation. As far as your last edit to Dark Side of the Moon: A Sci-Fi Adventure seems to be to remove the copyright violation, and I do not agree with the user reverting it and warning you. Sometimes users have automated tools and make mistakes. I will keep an eye on your situation in case you prematurely get blocked or something to that effect. But please, stop removing the deletion templates. Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Copyvios are serious and when you don't have a user that responds, what else are you supposed to do? Also, shouldn't the old revisions of the article be removed since they still hold the copyrighted versions? —Mike Allen 18:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:12, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. When you recently edited Guild Wars 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Havok (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dark (video game).
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —James ^{(Talk • Contribs)} • 12:39pm • 02:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

IW engine

Regarding your edits on IW engine:

Call of Duty: World at War (2008) IW 3.0 (Heavily Modified) - why does it need to be heavily modified? Modified should be adequate.

Call of Duty: Black Ops (2010) IW 3.0 (heavily modified CoD: World at War)[7] - again, I don't think its necessary.

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 (2011) MW3 engine (heavily modified CoD: Black Ops)[8][9] - this is completely false.

I am going to redo the engine listings to make it simpler.

BurkusCat (talk) 13:10, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Engine edits

Please stop your annoying editing on video game engines. There is no need to link to the developer or mention it was "heavily" modified. Please see WP:MOS before editing. --Soetermans. T / C 09:56, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Blur (video game), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Soetermans. T / C 10:02, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. For repeatedly changing video game engines in infoboxes. You really need to stop. Soetermans. T / C 10:05, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Theopolisme _TALK 15:44, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Saber Rider and the Star Sheriffs - The Game

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Saber Rider and the Star Sheriffs - The Game, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.animeflavor.com/index.php?q=node/14988.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 17:36, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to PlayStation 4, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 12:11, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Syberia III game engine

Hi Fazm1bico, I noticed that you added information to the Syberia III article regarding its game engine being 3DVIA Virtools 5.0. Do you have a reference for this being the case? I'm asking as User:PhantomT1412 had previously removed it from the article. Thanks. TubularWorld (talk) 21:50, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Destiny (video game), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. It's been a while, but you're at it again: do not make piped links for VG engines to its developer. Soetermans. T / C 10:39, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Dark (video game). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Could you PLEASE first take a decent look at the guidelines? And actually read them? Soetermans. T / C 11:21, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Oh, and the same goes for Hellraid: no WP:OVERLINKing; do not add breaks for platforms; do not add 'TBA' in infobox, the article body should mention that it is an upcoming game; per WP:MOSCAPS, no unnecessary capital letters, so first-person shooter and not First-Person Shooter; horror (genre) is not a video game genre, do not add it to the infobox. First read the guidelines before editing. I do not want to continue cleaning up after you. --Soetermans. T / C 11:26, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

And I just spotted 'Mad Riders. Seriously guy, give me a break. --Soetermans. T / C 11:27, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of The Journeyman Project Tribute for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Journeyman Project Tribute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Journeyman Project Tribute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 00:32, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dark (video game) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dark (video game), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:14, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --220 of ^Borg 11:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Dark (video game)

Hello Fazm1bico. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Dark (video game).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dark (video game)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Areal (video game)

Hello Fazm1bico. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Areal".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Areal (video game)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GamerPro64 14:59, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

20,000 Leagues: The Adventure Continues listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 20,000 Leagues: The Adventure Continues. Since you had some involvement with the 20,000 Leagues: The Adventure Continues redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 16:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

20,000 Leagues Under the Sea: The Adventure Continues listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea: The Adventure Continues. Since you had some involvement with the 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea: The Adventure Continues redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 16:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/20,000 Leagues Under the Sea: The Adventure Continues listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/20,000 Leagues Under the Sea: The Adventure Continues. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/20,000 Leagues Under the Sea: The Adventure Continues redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 16:53, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Fazm1bico. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Video Reality

The article Video Reality has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources or apparent notability outside SouthPeak Games

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IgelRM (talk) 21:35, 26 November 2023 (UTC)