Fbodurlar

Speedy deletion of Higly Filled Materials Institute

A tag has been placed on Higly Filled Materials Institute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. LCpl Stephen Bolin, USMC (talk) 21:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder2.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mprus.com/en/documents/brochures/MPR_Mini_Extruder.pdf. As a copyright violation, Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder2.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder2.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder2.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder2.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder2.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 17:26, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder-Drawings.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mprus.com/en/documents/brochures/MPR_Mini_Extruder.pdf. As a copyright violation, Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder-Drawings.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder-Drawings.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder-Drawings.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder-Drawings.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder-Drawings.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 17:26, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder Screws.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mprus.com/en/documents/brochures/MPR_Mini_Extruder.pdf. As a copyright violation, Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder Screws.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder Screws.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder Screws.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder Screws.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder Screws.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 17:26, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder Data Acquisition.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mprus.com/en/documents/brochures/MPR_Mini_Extruder.pdf. As a copyright violation, Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder Data Acquisition.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder Data Acquisition.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder Data Acquisition.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder Data Acquisition.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Mini Twin Screw Extruder Data Acquisition.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 17:26, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Twin Screw Extruder, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mprus.com/en/documents/brochures/MPR_Mini_Extruder.pdf Second offense. As a copyright violation, Twin Screw Extruder appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Twin Screw Extruder has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Twin Screw Extruder and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Twin Screw Extruder with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Twin Screw Extruder.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 13:22, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Highly Filled Materials Institute, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.hfmi.stevens-tech.edu/about.php http://www.hfmi.stevens-tech.edu/capab.php http://www.hfmi.stevens-tech.edu/technologies/ http://www.hfmi.stevens-tech.edu/tour/. As a copyright violation, Highly Filled Materials Institute appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Highly Filled Materials Institute has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Highly Filled Materials Institute and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Highly Filled Materials Institute with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Highly Filled Materials Institute.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 13:32, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Dilhan M. Kalyon, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://personal.stevens.edu/~dkalyon/ http://personal.stevens.edu/~dkalyon/dkalyon.publications.htm. As a copyright violation, Dilhan M. Kalyon appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Dilhan M. Kalyon has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Dilhan M. Kalyon and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Dilhan M. Kalyon with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Dilhan M. Kalyon.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 13:34, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Fbodurlar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 17:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Redirect of Dilhan Kalyon

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dilhan Kalyon, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dilhan Kalyon is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dilhan Kalyon, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 10:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problem follow-up: Twin Screw Extruder

Dear Fbodurlar:

Since we do not yet have verification of permission by the processes set out at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, this article has had to be deleted. This deletion is not necessarily permanent. If you have already sent a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed by the Communications Committee. Likewise, if you have not yet sent a letter, you may certainly do so at any point, and the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed.

If you do resend your letter, please be sure that the Wikipedia article is clearly noted as well as the external source and that your e-mail address is in some way connected to that external source, so that we can verify your authority to release the material. As Wikipedia does not require proof of identity on account creation, it is essential that we receive external proof of authorization in order to ensure that we remain compliant with US Copyright law. It is also essential that we verify that copyright holders understand the extent of the release they are authorizing, in that GNU Free documentation license permits modification and reuse in any forum, even commercial publication, as long as authorship credit is maintained.

If you have questions about the verification procedure, please feel free to contact me at my talk page. Alternatively, you might address them at the talk page of the copyright policy, which is generally monitored by volunteers experienced in processing such matters. We also have a help desk where you might find assistance at any time of day. Thank you.--Moonriddengirl ^(talk)

Your note

Hi. Thank you for your your note. The quickest and easiest way to verify permission for us to use this material is to have a note made here and here indicating that the material is released into public domain or under the GNU Free documentation license. (A link should be included there to the text of GFDL. There's one here.) If that page is updated to include such a link, you can simply recreate the page and place a note on the article's talk page linking to that release.

It becomes a little more complicated if that solution does not work for you. In that case, we need an e-mail to be sent to the Wikimedia Foundation verifying permission from an e-mail address connected to the publisher. Ideally, that permission should issue from dkalyon AT stevens DOT edu. (I'm not posting the e-mail address in standard formatting to prevent its being picked up here for spamming.) The e-mail needs to be sent to permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org. The subject line should include something like "Verification of permission, article Dilhan M. Kalyon". The body of the e-mail needs to contain a release based on the following: Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries. The first two sentences of that release are generalized to be used for text or images. Since this is text, you would want to be specific with the second line: "I agree to publish that work under the free license GNU Free Documentation License [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_the_GNU_Free_Documentation_License].

If other sources are also involved, the release needs to cover each page. Where it asks for a link to the WORK, you would want to include both http://personal.stevens.edu/~dkalyon/ and http://personal.stevens.edu/~dkalyon/dkalyon.publications.htm.

If you send release by e-mail, please let me know, and I will restore the articles to give the permissions process time to proceed. The article would remain blanked until the Communications Committee verifies permission, which usually takes around 5-7 days.

Having dropped all of this on you, I hate to complicate matters further, but as you are connected to the subject, I do need to point out our guidelines on working on articles that are closely connected to you. :) Please see our conflict of interest guidelines. It is possible to contribute to an article to which you are connected, if it is neutral and well sourced to prevent "original research" (a catch all phrase on Wikipedia that includes any material you may know to be true, but can't prove through previously published sources). But Wikipedians in general are highly averse to self-promotion, and in my personal opinion are sometimes overzealous in labeling material that way. Articles on people have to explain why their subjects matter in order to remain on the encyclopedia, but they must do so in a way that they do not cross the neutrality line. It's a delicate balance, and it can best be addressed by providing links to reliable sources that verify that the information in the biography is true. Given the results of a google book search, here, I suspect that can be easily done. (More potentially useful information is here.) Dr. Kalyon seems to me to easily meet our notability guidelines for academics.

Please let me know if any of this is unclear. I will be watching this page for a few days, so you can simply post any questions you may have here. If you've been a while coming back or if I don't respond promptly to a note here, you are more than welcome to leave another note at my talk page. I'll be happy to assist you as I can. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:32, 14 November 2008 (UTC)