Feb22babby

February 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Human rights in North Korea has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Human rights in North Korea was changed by Feb22babby (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871859 on 2014-02-24T06:51:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:51, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sckay27

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sckay27, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. E Wing (talk) 06:51, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Olga Constantinovna of Russia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. E Wing (talk) 06:52, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:E Wing, you may be blocked from editing. E Wing (talk) 06:54, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Olga Constantinovna of Russia. Jim1138 (talk) 06:54, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vaginal intercorse

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Vaginal intercorse, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. E Wing (talk) 07:01, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Feb22babby (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked until feburay 22 i did my time i have a right to say what i want ps i love wasting your time so i will not stop ops i am a sock puppet for User:Sckay27 on the 25 i will create a new account and wast your time againFeb22babby (talk) 07:03, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Admitted sock-vandal. DrKiernan (talk) 09:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.