FemVoice

Why not !

Voice feminization

Good work on the voice feminization merge. Looks good. Let me know if I can do anything. Czolgolz 12:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Good to hear from you! What have you been up to? I think the article is great, and by all means continue to edit. Czolgolz 23:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

I did look at the comments on Voice feminization before, actually, and though I don't agree with everything you said here, I think it's pretty clear that "cisman" and "ciswoman" aren't well-accepted enough, yet, to be mentioned in an encyclopedia entry. I was originally in favor of including the terms because I've heard people use them, but of course, I've heard people use a lot of terms that don't merit inclusion here. Catamorphism 17:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm insatiably curious, what can I say? The original article seemed reasonable enough, but the "1995" assertion is clearly false; that's why it's important for people to question unsourced assertions, as you're doing. Catamorphism 22:11, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

A latin Quote on Virtue

honestum tāle est ut vel sī ignōrarent id hominēs suā tamen pulchritūdine laudābile esset

FemVoice 00:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

You seem to be right...

...So I modified it per your request. Thank you for giving me a chance to do it however. Chooserr 06:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Catamorphism Would you like the first cut at cisgender

I am sure that AlexR will be back, but for now, would you like to clean help clean up cisgender, or would you trust me to start and you see if you would agree, given that I would support each of my changes in the talk section of the article? And, if I thought controversial, would defer to you since you seem to be the more open of our two minds.

Feel free to do what you can; I'll do what I can, as well, which may not include overhauling the whole article, as (contrary to appearances) I do have other responsibilities :-) Catamorphism 06:54, 8 June 2006 (UTC)