Ferschais

August 2015

Your recent editing history at Propaganda in Iran shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:45, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Propaganda in Iran

Please see == Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion == Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. for a discussion on your editing. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 20:50, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Civilian casualties in the Second Intifada has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Civilian casualties in the Second Intifada was changed by Ferschais (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960484 on 2015-08-31T20:45:54+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 23:29, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

• Your edit history is clear: you are a returning editor, possibly a sock, who's here to make non-neutral edits, and while you are doing so you are engaging in disruption and edit warring. Drmies (talk) 23:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ferschais (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm here to contribute. I have no more POV than Ism schism or BlueSalix. Double standard? Ferschais (talk) 01:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Single purpose account; WP:NOTHERE.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.