User talk:Field Marshal/Archive 1

Archive 1

Suvadeep Saha

• Bro you have commmented on wrong page. "Hdmanohar" has asked that question to me that whether he will name the article as wagc3 or wag10. He will give both name on that article. Also railway writes wagc3 in their loco list not wag10 you can check out that. Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 17:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

RDSO uses the name WAG10, furthermore the Railway Board had also adviced for that name to maintain the proper order of loco numbering. You can check the provisional speed certificate for wag 10 where you will find further info. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 17:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

• You have written this line "the cab profile of existing locomotives was widened to increase the field of view from the control cab". Actually original wdp-4 cabs were not widened instead a newer model was introduced with wider cabs called wdp-4b. That is why I have modify your edit because it means that existing wdp-4s cabs are widened. You check out that.Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 10:11, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Sir, the older WDP-4s which had the standard cabs are also being retrofitted with widened cabs. For example loco number 20027 earlier had a sharp face but now has the WDP4B cab face even though the classification is the same old WDP-4.Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 10:24, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

• Do you have any proof that all the locomotives are modified with wider cabs. If not then you should modify your edit in the criticism.Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 10:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Sir, I hope you have properly read what my edit says. Here, let me quote it for you -

in response, the cab profile of some WDP-4s were widened to increase the field of view

Do note that I've written some and not all. I hope that answers your query. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 11:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

• Yes I have noticed that because I have corrected it with some WDP-4. You have to make some more correction in that "criticism" topic that you have written "the hood" it will be called as "long hood". You can check out in youtube that it is called long hood in this link "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AMXkORUdOg" , you should watch and listen the video carefully from 5:57 min to 6:07 min then you will under stood what is short hood and long hood. You have made a mistake in the top speed of wdg-4 in the infobox. You have written 105kmph but actually it will be 100kmph according to dlw you can check out on this link "https://dlw.indianrailways.gov.in/works/uploads/File/WDG4.pdf". But wdg-4 can go beyond that speed with passenger trains.Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 12:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

It was an error on my part that I forgot to write 'some' and pressed the save changes button. Thank you for rectifying it. Regarding the hood part, Locomotives like WDM-3A and WDM3D have a short and long hood because the cab is situated in the middle but in WDP-4 the cab is at one extreme end, and the entirety of the hood is behind the cab. So the terminology used here is cab forward and hood forward. Furthermore, Wikipedia articles must be written in a way that a layman can understand them easily. Saying long hood instead of just hood sounds a bit more complex, however, that's just my take and you are welcome to change the 'hood' forward to 'long hood forward'. Also, the top speeds that I have mentioned are correct. They are taken from RDSO speed certificates. In the PDF that I have attached, see the first paragraph. You will see the speed limit of WDG-4 stated to be 105kmph as per RDSO letter SD.WDG4.11 . Also, I know that the loco has a higher speed potential but reaching those speeds is deemed unsafe by CRS and RDSO which is why we need not mention it in the article. Also, we don't know the exact numbers after which the loco would just oscillate too much and go off the rails. What you have shared is a DLW brochure, I think that RDSO document holds more value since RDSO is the main standards organization of Indian Railways. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 12:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

• Put zones on the left side of the table and complete the sheds with rest of the data quickly.Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 15:24, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

I've put the Zones on the left now. What is the rest of the data you are talking about? Also, seeing that there aren't many people who contribute to the Indian Railway Wiki articles, I thank you for your contribution and look forward to work with you! PS. If you have the data, you can add it into the pages, don't worry if it's a bit clunky, I'll refine that for you! :) -- Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 16:08, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

• I have renovate the loco shed with full details. So, whatever updates need to be done in the locomotive shed I will do that you should go with the other updates of the article.Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 17:01, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
• Give your mailid in my talk page so,that I can contact you easily.Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 17:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
• Thanks I have got your mail id. I will send you a mail on your mail I'd.Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 17:22, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Acknowledged. Good Night. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 17:27, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

• Same to you.Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 17:28, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
• I have send you a mail in your mail id confirm me that you have got the mail. Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 20:13, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Can you tell me in detail about your thinking that you have written in Indian railway wiki project talk page. Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 12:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Indian locomotive class WDAP-5

Hey fellow railfan, I have started the article on the Indian locomotive class WDAP-5. but since I have exams please try to built the article in my absence --Hdmanohar (talk) 08:32, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for making the page. Don't worry I will do my best! Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 08:35, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

• Yes man i'm michu from IRFCA. Whats your IRFCA id?--Hdmanohar (talk) 17:50, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

user:backontrack email: apmarshal3102@gmail.com Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 17:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

• Hey man I asked to create the article not mark it as a Stub. Hope you will start the work.--Hdmanohar (talk) 09:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

I'm currently busy in reviving the wikiproject Indian railways (you too are a member there). After I do that I will contribute to the WDAP-5. I will also add wdap5 to the to-do list of the wikiproject so more people will start contributing. I have sent a request to rdso for documents of wdap5 like I did with WDP4. It will take some time but it wil be done. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 09:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Indian locomotive class WDM-2G

As may have noticed the article is under construction. The reason I copied the infobox from WDM-2 is so that I can edit WDM-2G easily. The values will change in coming days. If you noticed all my loco articles are created this way--Hdmanohar (talk) 15:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

IRFCA FAQ project

Hey man i have also requested to join the FAQ rewrite which was accepted. But due to some issues I have been denied permission. i have requested the IRFCA mods to resolve the issue and will help in the rebuilding of our prestigious site--Hdmanohar (talk) 15:35, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

@Hdmanohar: Good. We really need people like you. Once the faq is written we can easily source data from there for wiki articles too. Do you want me to request the mods about the issue? Also give me your email, if possible, so we can talk over Google hangouts. --Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 16:38, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	For making a team and reviving WikiProject Indian railways naveenpf (talk) 09:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for my first barnstar @Naveenpf:, it mean a lot especially since it is related to railways! Going through the revision history, I did realise that you are one of the earliest editors to work on that WikiProject! Consider adding your name to the active member list?--Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 10:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For the good work on articles related to Indian locomotive Huss 12:12, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Indian locomotive class WAGC3/WAG-10

Hey man can you create the WAG-10 article. I am currently busy --Hdmanohar (talk) 11:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

@Hdmanohar:I have exams this month, ill see if i can. --Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 12:42, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

• @Field Marshal Aryan: no man I'm not leaving Wikipedia,I lost interest in the WAG-10 article. I will begin the shed articles from monday. --Hdmanohar (talk) 15:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Milhist!

Hello Field Marshal and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
• If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:44, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Correction

China didn't detain any Indian soldiers.

See

https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-asia-53102629

https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-china-denies-seizing-indian-personnel-during-galwan-valley-face-off-2828683

https://www.dw.com/en/china-denies-seizing-indian-troops/a-53869186 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ILoveEatingBats (talk • contribs) 16:15, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Indian soldiers have never been captured china has officialy announced nd Indian Army also clearly said there has been no detention — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.222.122.177 (talk) 17:59, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Signature

Hi Field Marshal Aryan, I am afraid your current signature is a bit too shouting. It is quite distracting in the midst of talk page discussions, e.g., Talk:2020 China-India skirmishes. Would you consider toning it down a little please? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:15, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Kautilya3 Sure thing. Can you please tell if any one of these is better? If not, I understand , and will use this --> Field Marshal Aryan (talk • contribs) 14:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

The second one might be ok. Can you put that here so we can see? In a discussion, you want the attention focused on what you are saying, rather than your signature! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Kautilya3 Never mind. I am sticking with this one! It's pretty close to the default too. Regards, Field Marshal Aryan (talk • contribs) 15:06, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Verona Murphy edit

I believe your deletion of my edit was a mistake.

The page claimed that the Tanaiste had found a campaign video disturbing and reference an article in the Irish Examiner - no such claim is supported in the newspaper article. Moconnor76 (talk) 19:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Moconnor76 The article clearly says so. let me quote it for you: "Tánaiste Simon Coveney said that what she said in her comments was wrong, and her choice of language about migrants was not acceptable." -source. Please don't remove sourced content in the future. Field Marshal Aryan (talk • contribs) 19:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

(talk While the Tanaiste may have found the original comments unacceptable, he made no reference to a subsequent campaign video. Moconnor76 (talk) 20:03, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Moconnor76 Can you please revert this edit of yours. I get that you mean to say that Tanaiste didn't say about the video and want to remove that part, but in this process you are removing the fact that Tanaiste didn't approve of her entire campaign as seen in the previous source. You should change the wording to reflect that but first revert your edit or I will be forced to. Field Marshal Aryan (talk • contribs) 20:14, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Beretta Stampede Edit

Hello, you recently reverted my own reversion of Beretta Stampede and gave the reason that I did not "adequately [explain] why" I removed the content I did. I am not sure what part of my message "Reverting nonsensical spam edit" was unclear. While reading the page I came upon the "Users" section and immediately found it suspicious due to its length and content. The long list of missing references (and the few that were there not generally seeming relevant) only added to this, and so I looked at the edit history and saw that the section was a recent addition by an anonymous user with no message given.

This is the original edit I was undoing. I would've used the usual "undo" link but a well-meaning (if misguided) bot and another editor doing rote syntax fixes had made two more edits to the content introduced here.

If you spend any time looking at that diff it seems to be some sort of weird spam with random keywords thrown in for its entirely missing references. Also, if you think about the actual content in context, many of the supposed "users" seem rather unlikely given the subject matter here. 2605:A601:A709:CD00:A93A:66EA:ED16:49C2 (talk) 07:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Sig

Just curious, you changed your signature again? DTM (talk) 11:35, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

DiplomatTesterMan, Yea. Kautilya said it was distracting/shouting. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 11:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Ah. I see. WP:SIGNATURE also gives guidelines for customizing your signature WP:CUSTOMSIG/P, including no usage of images WP:SIGIMAGE. Then again, Wikipedia:Signature tutorial has some signatures which have a decent amount of editing and supposedly still meet the guidelines such as the one explained on User:Wei4Green/signature. All said and done your current one serves its purpose well. DTM (talk) 03:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

FYI

Hello FMA. This edit restored the vandalism instead of removing it. I'm guessing it got caught up in other editors trying to deal with the IPs vandalism as quickly as they could but I wanted to let you know about it in case it happens again. Thanks for your vigilance and enjoy the rest of your weekend. MarnetteD|Talk 16:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

MarnetteD Very sorry. It seems to be a technical glitch because if it had reverted to the version by Zapodie (who had reverted to your version), it should have been the vandalism-free revision. Thanks for the understanding. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 17:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

No worries. Gremlins can get into the editing at anytime :-) I'm glad the IP has been blocked! MarnetteD|Talk 17:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Untitled message by HengPUngli

this man chakravarthy sulibele misleading people by his assumption lies. you guys are promoting him as Sacha, Just Go and visit his videos on Youtube --unsigned comment added by HengPUngli

@HengPUngli: Sorry I didn't get you. Can you please elaborate? Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 05:43, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Message from User:Wacky Wars

Hi Field Marshal Aryan this is me Wacky Wars and I have multiple sockpuppets:

Wacky Wars will make more socks soon. Message left by 119.198.4.104 (talk) 10:25, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Reverted as “vandalism”

Hi My recent edit which took me almost 4 hours on citing a Chinese declassified internal use document has been completely removed on the 1967 skirmish article by Trojanishere. I don’t see it being vandalism in anyway and I left the Indian claim as is, just added Chinese sources on the Chinese side. I added sources on how China still has control of Cho La till this day and it was completely deleted． He claimed that I used 1 sources for too many footnotes. I believe this is against Wikipedia rules and I do not see what I did being vandalism. YuukiHirohiko (talk) 18:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)YuukiHirohiko

(talk page stalker) YuukiHirohiko, please note that you are still new here, and it takes time to understand and master Wikipedia policies. Please familiarise yourself with WP:RS (in particular WP:SCHOLARSHIP and WP:THIRDPARTY). Chinese internal documents are WP:PRIMARY sources, and they are practically useless in a conflict situation. You need to consult third party scholarly sources.

I would also caution you against trying to prove points that you believe. That is not the purpose of Wikipedia. As a Wikipedia editor, you are bound by WP:V and WP:NPOV, which means that you need to consult all the available sources with an open mind and find out what they say. Only then should you be editing articles.

You have already received an WP:ARBIPA sanctions alert. If you do not follow this approach, I am afraid you will be facing sanctions. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

@Kautilya3 You don’t seem to understand what an internal use document is. It’s meant to be used internally in the military to have the clearest understanding of how the battle went, how the losses were, how it happened. It was never meant for the general public nor was it political. In fact the sources had records all the way up to the 70s as it logged the PLA 11’s division’s battles from its formation to its relocation in northern China. The original article even cited Indian Government released figures, and Indian general’s quotes AT THE TIME as a valid source. You clearly haven’t seen that either. You immediately went for a stand of blame and the defensive push a view point when you clearly haven’t even tried to check nor read my edits. The article only had single party Indian accounts backing up BOTH losses of the conflict, I merely added a section under the Chinese losses section which was already a paragraph in one of the sections. I have edited many Eastern Front articles before even making an account. Open mind? Because at this stage to me you sound like you are not approaching this with a very open mind.YuukiHirohiko (talk) 22:26, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Sorry

Hey, I just wanted to apologize for reverting your edit here. I somehow managed to misclick while trying to examine the contributions of an IP. Best, Blablubbs (talk) 22:49, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Blablubbs, Hey, no need to apologise! You undid your edit so it's all good. Even I goof up a lot! Regards, Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 22:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

wdg4g

• Don't include locomotive shed under operation keep it separate. keep locomotive shed not holding because in future more sheds will be add on and also its sounds better.Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 08:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

  Suvadeep Saha56, Bu there are only two sheds Roza and Gandhidham so I was thinking that the section would be too small. I am thinking of nominating it as good article by this month. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 08:59, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

• There are lots of problem for nominating in GA criteria I have faced it with wdm2. They will not accept if there is locomotive shed.You have to completely remove the loco shed and just put the number of locomotives produced in the info box which is not possible. so, you should fill the article will proper info and move on to next article. No problem keep it seperate.But I don't think that 2 sheds will be enough to put 1000 locomotives I think in future more sheds will come.Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 09:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
• How much have progress in the article making of WDG-5 and WDAP-5.Do one thing complete the pending dedicated locomotive article first then Iam making a list of diesel and electric loco shed which do not have any separate article. Diesel loco list is done but electric is left. After that we will decide which loco shed articles will be made first according to priority basis.Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 09:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
• Aryan Gandhidham shed is still under construction only Roza shed is operational.Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 13:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

  Suvadeep Saha56, I'm writing with an eye for the future. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 15:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

• I have told you before about the problem of loco shed topic name. But in my point of view fleet will not work but What ever better you think you can do it by replacing wdg4g loco shed topic name to some other name. There is no objection on behalf of me. But you should contact me directly not via him.Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 17:25, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Narrow-gauge locomotives of India

Aryan can you restore the Narrow gauge locomotives of India article to its original name and data that is Indian locomotive series NDM and ZDM because it is a dedicated article of this 2 locomotive series and and Vastmaxed has redirected the page to Narrow gauge locomotives of India which is not correct.Suvadeep Saha56 (talk) 13:10, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indian locomotive class WDG-4G

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Indian locomotive class WDG-4G you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArnabSaha -- ArnabSaha (talk) 15:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indian locomotive class WDG-4G

The article Indian locomotive class WDG-4G you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Indian locomotive class WDG-4G for issues which need to be addressed. ❯❯❯ S A H A 17:56, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

ArnabSaha Thanks a lot for taking up the review, I saw it. It's just that it was getting pretty late and I need to do some non-wiki stuff so I figured I would start doing the amends from tomorrow morning. Regards, Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 18:06, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Field Marshal Aryan, I would love to see it as GA. ❯❯❯ S A H A 18:12, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Mz7 (talk) 00:36, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Leap Second

Hi!

Saw that your revert to Leap second was reverted by an IP address that appears to just be section blanking and was recently warned. Just wanted to give you a heads up, may need to block IP address temporarily. Thanks! —Σosthenes12 ^Talk 06:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Nevermind, user was blocked. Thanks! —Σosthenes12 ^Talk 06:17, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Sosthenes12, Hey thanks a lot for letting me know. The admins at AIV do a fantastic job. Cheers, Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 06:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

This barnstar is for the excellent work that you've been doing. Spending time to help Wikipedia's new users and with such commitment and kindness that you've been giving - even when it's not easy or if they may have a conflict of interest - is something that I wish many (if not most) of our experienced editors would start doing and improve on. What you're doing will not only set a positive experience for Wikipedia's new users, it will also build your character and your experience on this project. Keeping 100% calm and civil when dealing with occasionally impatient and angry new users is not easy to do, and is a great characteristic to build and strengthen for when you decide to move into deeper waters here. Thanks for doing what you're doing, and I hope you keep it up. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a ton, Oshwah. User retention, truly, is an integral part of building an encyclopedia that relies on willing volunteers. Editors like me have a lot to learn from editors like you and your words of encouragement mean a lot. Have a great day. Regards, Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 07:15, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome, and I absolutely agree - retention is vital, and you're doing a great job with helping to keep retention high. :-) Best - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Quick disclosure: Oshwah, the ASCII stop sign on the top of my talk page was blatantly copied from you, I hope you won't mind. :-) Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 07:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Natasha (movie)

Hi, maybe my phrasing could be improved, but I think the original is the non-neutral one. "Paper of record" is the Globe and Mail's slogan - that is, it's advertising, not an objective description. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.192.38.217 (talk) 07:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for contacting me. Indeed, your edit was in good faith and you only intended to fix the neutrality. Sorry if the notice felt harsh but we can't usually refer to organisations with 'so called' as that looks sarcastic and less neutral, even when trying to fix promotional. Instead, we can remove the promotional sounding material altogether to restore neutrality. It's my mistake for not checking the context properly. I have made an edit which should address your concern. Regards, Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 08:04, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indian locomotive class WDG-4G

The article Indian locomotive class WDG-4G you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Indian locomotive class WDG-4G for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. ❯❯❯   S A H A 20:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, ArnabSaha. I will try to think of some good facts that can be used from the article. If you have any in mind, do let me know. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 20:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Field Marshal Aryan, sure .btw, before nominating anything for GA, always request for copy edit in WP:GOCE, to rectify any issue. if u r planning to nominate multiple articles, one after another, then do one thing.

1. start improving the article
2. when u reach 25%, request for copyedit. the copyediting takes 25-30 days.
3. when u reach 75%, request for copyedit of ur 2nd article.
4. in the meantime complete the 1st article.
5. Now, start ur 2nd article.

keep it in mind, u can request only 2 articles. once one gets completed, u can request another. ❯❯❯   S A H A 08:12, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

David Morgan and Overton Baseball Championship

Dear Mr. Aryan, The citation you requested can be found in the archives of the Nashville Tennessean on June 4, 1971 or through the TSSAA in Heritage, TN. The TSSAA is the governing body for all sports in the state of Tennessee. The address and phone number is:

TSSAA 3333 Lebanon Road, PO Box 319 Hermitage, TN 37076 P - (615) 889-6740; F - (615) 889-0544

The Nashville Tennessean is the primary newspaper for the Nashville area and the archives are available online.

Sincerely, David Morgan 108.160.180.68 (talk) 00:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

I'm assuming that you are Dcmorgan17. If the references are available online and they are reliable, then you can add them back but you must include the references using inline citations so that there is evidence that the information you gave is verifiable. Also, it is generally advisable that you do not edit using an IP address if you have an account as it can become a privacy concern and people may think that you are indulged in sockpuppetry. Regards, Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 10:04, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Dear Mr Aryan, I have several articles pertaining to the subject matter. How do you want me to forward them to you? Sincerely, David Morgan Dcmorgan17 (talk) 13:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Dcmorgan17 (talk) 13:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

@Dcmorgan17: What kind of articles are they? Are they available online or are they 'offline' (published as hardcopy or in a newspaper)? In any case, you don't have to forward them to me. As long as they are Reliable, you should be able to use the "cite" button (can be found on the top of your toolbar) to insert references. If you don't see the cite button you can use the <ref> tag to manually add the reference. Read more about it by clicking here. You can click here to see the different types of sources that can be used as a reference on articles and read about how to insert them. Reach out for further assistance.

Category:Lо∨ifm Hot 100

This page is currently semi-protected so that only established, registered users can edit it.

Why is the page protected? While most articles can be edited by anyone, semi-protection is sometimes necessary to prevent vandalism to popular pages. The reason for protection can be found in the protection log. If there are no relevant entries in the protection log, the page may have been moved after being protected.

What can I do? If you have a user account, log in first. If you do not yet have an account, you may create one; after 4 days and 10 edits, you will be able to edit semi-protected pages. Discuss this page with others. For move-protected pages, see requested moves. Request that the page's protection level be reduced. Find out more about how to get started editing Wikipedia. If you have noticed an error or have a suggestion for a simple, non-controversial change, you can submit an edit request, by clicking the button below and following instructions. An established user may then make the change on your behalf. Please check the talk page first in case the issue is already being discussed.

Submit an edit request

Q-WKPA: What? Please don't delete speedy deletion tags. You risk getting blocked. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 10:46, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

do not attack the music brand, it is defined as vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Q-WKPA (talk • contribs) 10:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Page Editing of Indegene

Thowfeeq Vallur (talk) 12:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Hi Field Marshal Aryan

I am employee working for Indegene and I have noted that the content on the Wikipedia page of Indegene is outdated. Hence, I tried to update the latest content which is deleted. Request you to approve the updated changes or provide a solution which helps me update the latest content.

Thank you.

Thowfeeq Vallur: Thanks for reaching out, I have replied to you on your talk page. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 12:15, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Unaccepted an edit you accepted

I deprecated/unaccepted these changes which you accepted. They changed the preferred, sourced pronoun of a person in the article. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 14:48, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

BlackcurrantTea, Thank you for amending my mistakes. I should have checked that properly. Regards, Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 14:59, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

User talk:Glen

Thanks for catching my mistake. I accidentally only got Sinebot. Not the most useful edit... Meters (talk)

Meters, you are always welcome. :-) Regards, Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 09:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Changing of Loco templates

Hey man, While changing the locomotive templates, you accidentally caused the templates to be uneditable. I hope next time you make sure that everything works fine after editing--Area 51 Machan (talk) 11:29, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

User:Field Marshal Aryan, What do you mean? I don't think I broke the template. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 11:33, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Area 51 Machan while I looked at the template, the view and discuss button was completely and when I tried to edit the template, it redirected me to a blank page.You can check it.--Area 51 Machan (talk) 11:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Area 51 Machan, Let me check in the sandbox. I will let you know the results Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 11:40, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

ok man --Area 51 Machan (talk) 11:43, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Area 51 Machan, Be careful. Don't edit my comments. Thanks. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 11:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Area 51 Machan: The issue has been fixed. Thanks for letting me know. btw, why the name change? Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 11:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

hey, mrinal sen was a great indian filmmaker everyone knows that, its a neutral point man. dont change it, it was there. he is one of leading filmmakers in india in his times — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorae2001 (talk • contribs) 13:16, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Dorae2001, no it is not, you can't refer to people as 'great' an say that it is neutral. No matter how high opinion you personally hold of them. Please read WP:NPOV and maybe WP:HONORIFICS for more info. Thanks, Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 13:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

In the name of Neutrality

Well, I leave it to your intellectual honesty if you think that Romila Thapar being described as Marxist is anything less than neutral, where as it is fine to attribute pejoratives like ‘Islamophobe’ to Koenraad Elst by the same user ‘Regentspark’. It may take some time, before people will openly question the neutrality of Wiki.

But, sooner or later it shall happen. Just a question of time. Carry on with your neutral work. Snigdhanchandran (talk) 13:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Snigdhanchandran. Anything you add to Wikipedia needs to be backed by a reliable source. But your addition didn't have any source, thus failing Verifiability policy of Wikipedia. ❯❯❯   S A H A 15:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For the good work you are doing to keep Wikipedia clean. ❯❯❯   S A H A 13:44, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

ArnabSaha: Thanks for the encouragement! Regards, Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 13:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Re: False positive

My bad, you're right. I'll try to be more careful to AGF about links. Thanks for letting me know. TuskDeer (talk) 19:36, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Note

Just wanted to let you know that there is an IP I've been chasing down the edit filter. (The one you warned about Person of color...) He's been edit warring over adding the word 'n*gger' to the article and been reported to AIV. I just reverted some vandalism he added here but if you see lots of edits it's probably me reverting him. Just a heads up. :) Regards, Giraffer (stay home) 08:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Giraffer, Thanks a lot, I gave him a first and final warning seeing how disruptive he was but now he has stooped so low as to harass editors. Thanks again, Field Marshal (talk) 08:14, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Yes, right after I published my message I got 3 new ones: your thanks, him vandalizing my TP and then that getting reverted... a little chaos. Edit: He's blocked for 72hrs. Regards, Giraffer (stay home) 08:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

WP:IRW

I want to talk some important points about the wikiproject. btw, have u joined the discord server?

1. Assigning coordinators
2. Conducting a chat based meeting by this week
3. Newsletters
   ❯❯❯   S A H A 16:39, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

   ArnabSaha, Yeah I have joined the discord server. Go ahead. Field Marshal (talk) 16:58, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

   Field Marshal Aryan, what's ur username? ❯❯❯   S A H A 17:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

   ArnabSaha, bob the bomber#6926 (Disclaimer: I am willfully disclosing this information). Field Marshal (talk) 17:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

New message on 18 July 2020

RE: Missing child.

Why would you remove something like that? You are creating more work and not helping. 174.26.80.92 (talk) 22:11, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

The info you added was not sourced at all. Therefore I had to remove it. Field Marshal (talk) 12:08, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

New message on 20 July 2020

Everyone can access the knowledge now proven by many medical doctors and scientists, as well as some philosophers such as myself, that derives from thousands year old Eastern medicine and philosophy, but the new work by James Nestor, BREATH: The New Science of a Lost Art also demonstrates this clearly and fully. Therefore, the entries about breathing, breathwork, and all related will have to be updated to meet the science. I was adding a note in that regard because so many are being and can be helped by this science and the proper breathing (especially nose breathing) exercises. Medical doctors now have documented research, trials, and more proving such proper nose breathing techniques have and can cure several physical and mental illnesses. It's revolutionary and a need for these Covid-19 and overall challenging times globally. Thank you (from a PhD in Philosophy) Misfitmetaphysics (talk) 17:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Misfitmetaphysics, I appreciate that you are a PHD but unless you can provide a reliable source that can back up your claims, your additions can not be permitted. Wikipedia has a policy against original research. Please cite your text with sources if you don't want people removing them. Regards, Field Marshal (talk) 17:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

New message on 20 July 2020

Thank you for reminding me to use a better citation. I think the book publisher's citation about Nestor's new work is credible enough.

https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/547761/breath-by-james-nestor/ Misfitmetaphysics (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Misfitmetaphysics, I can't really tell how reliable that book is but all I can do is assume good faith from you. However, if you are planning on adding that, you must try to keep your tone neutral and not the way you currently are writing because if there is an official paper from the american cancer society that refutes breathwork's effectiveness, then just a single book might not be enough to say discredit that. Regards, Field Marshal (talk) 17:46, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

New message on 20 July 2020

Here are the reviews from scholarly others on the book publisher's main page for James Nestor's BREATH: The New Science of a Lost Art. I am not sure what other kind of citation for this small communal page and reference you would like, but there are plenty of scientific studies now published in NATURE and other credible sources. It is responsible to update this information as calling it "new age" is damaging the general community knowledge of the subject matter and its history. Thanks much.

PRAISE “With his entertaining, eerily well-timed new book, James Nestor explains the science behind proper breathing and how we can transform our lungs and our lives. . . . The book is brisk and detailed, a well-written read that is always entertaining, as he melds the personal, the historical, and the scientific.” —The Boston Globe

“It’s a rare popular-science book that keeps a reader up late, eyes glued to the pages. But Breath is just that fascinating. It will alarm you. It will gross you out. And it will inspire you. Who knew respiration could be so scintillating?” —Spirituality & Health

“Breath provides a new perspective of modern day technology and how we’ve unknowingly abandoned the answers we’ve always had. James Nestor artfully brings back what modern society has walked away from by combining ancestral techniques and new age technology in one elegant book.” —Scientific Inquirer

“A transformative book that changes how you think about your body and mind.” —Joshua Foer, New York Times–bestselling author of Moonwalking with Einstein: The Art and Science of Memory

“Breath is an utterly fascinating journey into the ways we are wired. No matter who you are, you’ll want to read this.” —Po Bronson, New York Times–bestselling author of What Should I Do with My Life? and coauthor of NutureShock

“An eye-opening, epic journey of human devolution that explains why so many of us are sick and tired. A must-read book that exposes what our health care system doesn’t see.” —Dr. Steven Y. Park, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, author of Sleep, Interrupted

“I don’t say this often, but when I do I mean it: This book changed my life. Breath is part scientific quest, part historical insight, part Hero’s Journey, full of groundbreaking ideas, and a rollicking good read. I had no idea that the simple and intuitive act of inhaling and exhaling has taken such an evolutionary hit. As a result, I figured out why I sleep so badly and why my breathing feels so often out of sync. With a few simple tweaks, I fixed my breathing and fixed myself. A transformational book!” —Caroline Paul, bestselling author of The Gutsy Girl

“If you breathe, you need this book. When we undervalue anything, including something so basic as breathing, bad things always happen—and Nestor makes it clear how awful it’s gotten. But he also provides a clear airway back to better, deeper, stronger respirations.” —Wallace J. Nichols, PhD, New York Times–bestselling author of Blue Mind

“Breath shows us just how extraordinary the act of breathing is and why so much depends on how we do it. An enthralling, surprising, and often funny adventure into our most overlooked and undervalued function.” —Bonnie Tsui, author of Why We Swim and American Chinatown

“A welcome, invigorating user’s manual for the respiratory system.” —Kirkus Reviews

“Although we all breathe, there is an art and science to breathing correctly . . . Full of fascinating information an compelling arguments, this eye-opening (or more aptly a mouth-closing and nostril-opening) work is highly recommended.” —Library Journal Misfitmetaphysics (talk) 17:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

New message on 22 July 2020

Resolved

HI there,

The source is already on the ABC story listed - If I has cited it, it would be doubling on the source. 141.168.18.239 (talk) 01:02, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

New message on 22 July 2020

Hello Field Marshal Aryan, My pranams to you. I did remove the picture in the site as the picture was not the picture of Diwan Behadur - V Nagamaiya. I am very proud to say that I am part of the family, the 6th generation. I have uploaded the new photo. Thank you. Vssundaresan (talk) 03:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Namaste Vssundaresan! Thaks for reaching out to me. I am afraid that the image file you added is missing/non-existent and shows up with a red link. I will have to restore the previous version to prevent keeping a broken infobox. If you have a photo which is copyright-free, kindly upload it to Wikimedia Commons and it can be used over there. Important: Do note that as per our policy, you must declare on your user page or talk page that you have a conflict of interest regarding the article. You are also not advised to edit the article directly and instead use the {{Request edit}} template on the talk page of the article. Regards, Field Marshal (talk) 05:37, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Update: I went through commons and saw the file you uploaded. The missing file error came up because you did not specify the name correctly. The file seems to be copyright free and your own work so I have added it to the article. Thanks a lot for your contributions. Regards, Field Marshal (talk) 05:47, 22 July 2020 (UTC)