Fileunderwater
Proposed deletion of Species sorting
editThe article Species sorting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This is not an article. It is a 600 word quote plus six words. If this can't be rewritten for Wikipedia, it should be deleted.
Thanks for marking it clearly as a quote. I wanted to let you know before it was deleted. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 03:56, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Happy Earth day!
editHello! Wishing you a Happy Earth day on the behalf of WikiProject Environment and WikiProject Ecology.
What is this?
What you can do!!
Newly nominated content
Similar events
|
|
|
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Roland JD-Xi (June 14)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roland JD-Xi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Roland JD-Xi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Fileunderwater!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TipsyElephant (talk) 15:36, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
|
Concern regarding Draft:Roland JD-Xi
editHello, Fileunderwater. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roland JD-Xi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
External academic review and publication of Wikipedia pages
editHi Fileunderwater. In case you'd not come across it before, I thought I'd message to ask whether there are any wikipedia articles that you'd be interested in creating/updating/overhauling and submitting for external, academic peer review.
The WikiJournal of Science (www.wikijsci.org) couples the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the encyclopedia. For existing Wikipedia articles, it's a great way to get additional feedback from external experts. Peer-reviewed articles are dual-published both as standard academic PDFs, as well as having changes integrated back into Wikipedia. This improves the scientific accuracy of the encyclopedia, and rewards authors with citable, indexed publications. It also provides much greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.
Note that we do have to publish under real names, so if you don't want your real name associated to your username, you may have to choose atopic that your username has not previously edited.
Anyway, let me know whether you'd be interested in putting an article through academic peer review (either solo, or with a team of coauthors).
All the best, T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 10:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)