Filter1987

Original masters

I changed album type to 'Greatest Hits' because 'Greatest Hits album' prevents the infobox from showing up green, the standard infobox color for compilations and greatest hits albums. I since added a longtype field so that it will display 'Greatest Hits album'. Cheers --Alcuin 19:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

skinny puppy

we were discussing SP's Censor single.Naufana : talk 02:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Requesting deletion

Hey. If you mistakenly create a page, like with Up Through the Linear Shadows, you can ask it to be speedy deleted by adding {{db-author}} on top of it. Prolog 19:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

So they're "studio albums" now?

This bot seems to be going through many album wikis now (particularly most of the ones I've created and contributed) and labelling them as "studio albums". I would've already done this myself if I was previously aware that we as editors had to state the obvious. It's a little annoying, but more so when it labels Bloodrock Live as being a studio album when the title clearly implies otherwise. I'm changing it to what must be the "appropriate" format. That's all. Filter1987 03:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

No it didn't do that. That was a change in the {{:tl:Infobox Album}} at around the same time. Rich Farmbrough, 21:55 16 November 2006 (GMT).

Revelry

Hi! First let me thank you for expending aticles about Beyond Dawn and their albums, this band is surely underrated and did need some more information about it on wikipedia. I created the article about the album Revelry by Beyond Dawn. I included "Naaki Kita : Violence on Tender" in the guest part as it is written on the album, but I never really figured out what "violence" means here. As you seem to know a bit about Beyond Dawn I would like to know your point of view about the meaning of that particular word here, not that it really matters but I just wonder if I was right to write it in the article since I don't really what it means here. Thanks. Abkahn 20:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip about the so-called "violence" on Tender. Now there is one last thing I cannot figure out: if I am not mistaken, there is no violin on that song...so I am not changing the article about Revelry for the moment. I hope you had the chance to listen to that album since. Anyway thank you again for your dedication, it's cool to have people interested in that band around here. Abkahn 20:10, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Beyond Dawn

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! You recently added an external link to a fansite in an article. It has been removed because the link pointed to a non-encyclopedic source. Please refer to Wikipedia's policy on external links for more information. ' --Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 20:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Sandbox

Please don't remove the sandbox heading. It is there so it can reset itself periodically. --Umalee 18:19, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Beyond Dawn - Up Through the Linear Shades.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Beyond Dawn - Up Through the Linear Shades.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bloodrock - Bloodrock 'N' Roll.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodrock - Bloodrock 'N' Roll.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bloodrock - Bloodrock 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodrock - Bloodrock 3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bloodrock - Bloodrock Live.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodrock - Bloodrock Live.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bloodrock - Bloodrock U.S.A..jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodrock - Bloodrock U.S.A..jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bloodrock - Triptych.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodrock - Triptych.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bloodrock - Whirlwind Tongues.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodrock - Whirlwind Tongues.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Tales from an Extinguished World

I have nominated Tales from an Extinguished World, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tales from an Extinguished World. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:19, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Endeavor (song)

The article Endeavor (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable single

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:46, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Beyond Dawn - Up Through the Linear Shades.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beyond Dawn - Up Through the Linear Shades.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:32, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of DOA (album)

The article DOA (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable album as required by WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattg82 (talk) 00:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Bloodrock 'n' Roll for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bloodrock 'n' Roll is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloodrock 'n' Roll until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sjrct (talk) 17:41, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloodrock - Bloodrock 'N' Roll.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloodrock - Bloodrock 'N' Roll.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Time to Fly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Time to Fly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time to Fly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:34, 17 May 2018 (UTC)