June 2024

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dean Schneider:, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. YouTube and personal websites are not considered reliable sources. Panian513 18:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I understand, but everything what I write there is a true and accurate, if I will change sources would it be ok? FireCheetah123 (talk) 18:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Make sure that anything added or changed in an article is backed up by a reliable source before publishing an edit, and cite those reliable sources. Here are two guides:
WP:CS
WP:RS Panian513 18:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok, thank you :) FireCheetah123 (talk) 18:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Why did you delete quotes frames, and the inforlation about Valuse Culture? I just want to know what was wrong with it :) FireCheetah123 (talk) 15:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I removed what was considered puffery, which are grand adjectives and content used to promote features. This includes "engaging" and "inspiring," which are subjective terms. Wikipedia is about neutrality and objectivity - the article is there to report the sourced facts, not promote the subjects of their articles.
Additionally, I removed content that was not backed up by sources, such as the subject's marriage. I just reverted the recent edit to the article as that also added unsourced content. Please refer back to the guides I previously shared. Panian513 15:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok thank you. It's my first time when I am publishing something on wiki, that's why I don't know many things, I read the guide, but is seems not blow-by-blow, I'll read it again. I wanted this page to be more accurate and up to date, that's why I decided to write this, I have followed Dean for 4 years, that's why I know so much about him, And it's hard to me to find sources again, but I understand why you deleted some informations. But I don't understand why you removed the part about HM not being public and open to visitors when I added a source that says so. FireCheetah123 (talk) 16:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I removed that sentence because much of it was bolded, and per MOS:BOLD, bolding of words should not be done for emphasis. In general, a lot of these edits, with the bolding and the random block quotes, tend to treat the article like a fan page or social media content, not an encyclopedia entry. Treat Wikipedia like academic writing - it's about plain, formal, objective reporting on a subject. Panian513 16:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I see, if the sentence is not bolded, will it be ok? I decided to include this information there because people often ask about it, and it would be publicly available, true information. FireCheetah123 (talk) 16:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sure, as long as it's supported by a reliable source. Panian513 14:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply