Firefox lani

July 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Justinian I. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 18:28, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

• Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Justinian I and Justin. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.-- 88.203.200.74 (talk) 15:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

My edits are based on sources, so I don't see any reasons that, why are you removing my edits!! --Firefox lani (talk) 21:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Justinian I‎

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

My edits about Justinian are based on sources, so I don't see any reasons, why are they removing my edits.. --Firefox lani (talk) 21:20, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Then I would suggest you use the talk page and get consensus. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Battle of Callinicum

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. This includes the times you are logged out and edit warring as well. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Justin I, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 15:16, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Justinian I. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 15:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Oh I don't need your warnings, I KNOW what I'm doing..Firefox lani (talk) 16:14, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Since you "know what you're doing"

See here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

I have been blocked for 24 hours.It's nothing but just a small time, tomorrow I will edit again..But I'm not going to vandalize anymore, but if I edit something based on sources, do not dare to threat me again.I'm tired of your warnings, every time even if I contribute on something, you will warn me again and again.Let this not happen again. Firefox lani (talk) 21:59, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:15, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Justinian I. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 11:55, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Discussion on Justinian I

Judging from your disruptive editing, I would suggest you engage in discussion. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:43, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Blocked indef

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruption of Wikipedia and abuse of multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The evidence presented in this 3RR case from August 2015 indicates that you are the same editor as User talk:46.19.231.255. Since that IP is currently blocked for a week, your editing with Firefox lani to repeat some of the IP's changes at Constantine the Great is block evasion and abuse of multiple accounts. (The IP is a 'pro-Illyrian' editor and so are you). See WP:GAB for how you can request unblock. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:45, 15 October 2015 (UTC)