User talk:Flaviusvulso/Archive 1
Welcome to Wikipedia!
edit
|
Ancient Roman inquires
editYour input would be appreciated at
- Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities#How many official Dictators to time of Roman Empire
- Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities#"lex Junia Licinia"
- Thanks.--Doug Coldwell talk 21:09, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia Day Melbourne Meetup
editHi there. Just inviting you to the Melbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there! SteveBot (talk) 01:57, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)
Journal Of Roman Studies
editThis help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
How can I gain access to the Journal of Roman Studies?
- You can subscribe to the Journal of Roman Studies here [1]. These sorts of questions may best suited to the Wikipedia:Reference desk --Stephen 05:48, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Military History introduction
editHello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
- Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
- If you have an idea for improving the project, we have a strategy think tank that provides a dedicated forum for discussing it.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 23:42, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
editHi. When you recently edited Chariovalda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batavi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed, thanks for letting me know. Flaviusvulso (talk) 12:35, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
No image of Tacitus survives
editHello, Per WP:V please provide a basis and source for your statement that "No image of Tacitus survives". Please also read WP:Truth. These statements can not be issued as edicts and per WP:V need to be substantiated by WP:RS sources. Please do not revert, sans discussion here about your sources for the stated claim. Thank you. History2007 (talk) 04:23, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- A source of my statement is the caption of the image on this page Tacitus. The notion that this image is of Tacitus seems to have originated here which seems to be a reliable source. Where is this antique bust now I wonder? How was it determined that this bust is a faithful representation of Tacitus? Flaviusvulso (talk) 02:49, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for discussing it rather than reverting. But the way Wikipedia works, unless you have a source that says Mr X faked this image you have no basis (per WP:V) for sating that "No image of Tacitus survives" for that would be your own reasoning, which falls under WP:OR. And a reading of WP:Truth would be essential here. So we can all wonder, but in the absence of WP:RS sources the statement "No image of Tacitus survives" fails WP:V and can not be used in Wikipedia. I do not create Wiki-policy, I just follow it. History2007 (talk) 03:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
editHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 16 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Vonones
- Quintus Caecilius Metellus Creticus Silanus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Vonones
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Re: User pages
editSorry, I just realized what happened, and was going to tell you. That page ended up in the main space, like an article would. To make a page in your userspace, you need to put the word User: before the title. Want me to restore the page and move it to the correct one? Academic Challenger (talk) 03:56, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Ironically, it looked at first like you were the vandal and were posting the warnings given to you for some reason! But looking at the contributions this is clearly not the case. Academic Challenger (talk) 03:58, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. I was just saving some sample messages. Could you restore the page please? Flaviusvulso (talk) 04:01, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Done. I created the page User:Flaviusvulso/ForVandals by restoring, moving and redeleting the page you created. You should fix the link on your user page to go to this correct page. Let me know if you have any questions or need any other assistance. Academic Challenger (talk) 04:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, its all good.Flaviusvulso (talk) 04:11, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Dacia
edit- Thanks so much for the work on Domitian's Dacian War --Codrin.B (talk) 21:41, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I intend to do some more work it. Flaviusvulso (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
February Melbourne Meetup
editHi All. Just letting you know that we have another meetup planned for Melbourne, on Sunday, 26th February at 11am. More details can be found at the meetup page. Pizza will be provided. Look forward to seeing all of you there :-) SteveBot (talk) 23:01, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 4
editHi. When you recently edited Lucius Arruntius the Younger, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Antonia and Interamnia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
How to change templates
editI'd like to make a slight change to this template: "Julio-Claudian dynasty".
Roman imperial dynasties | ||
---|---|---|
Julio-Claudian dynasty | ||
Chronology | ||
27 BC – AD 14 |
||
AD 14–37 |
||
AD 37–41 |
||
AD 41–54 |
||
AD 54–68 |
||
|
||
How can I do that?
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
- It is located at Template:Julio-Claudian dynasty; remove the -helped from the braces above in edit mode here if you need further help about this. Dru of Id (talk) 03:37, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Redundant categories
editI removed the Ancient women category from the Thusnelda article because it is already in the Women in first century warfare category, which is a sub category of the Women in ancient warfare category, which is under the parent category of Ancient women. Its redundant. Asarelah (talk) 01:49, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- Makes sense. Thanks. Flaviusvulso (talk) 01:56, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
editHi. When you recently edited Lucius Arruntius the Younger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Melbourne meetup
editHey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:30, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:06, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 14:41, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:54, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:19, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:50, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Military history coordinator election
editThe Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012
edit
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Tragedy And Hope Cover.png)
editThanks for uploading File:Tragedy And Hope Cover.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Schneider Electric
editThis help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Someone is blanking my change to Schneider Electric citing Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing as the reason. Not sure if they are correct in doing this. Can I put back my addition?
- Your previous edits did indeed look to be close paraphrasing of Schneider Electric's website. However, the version you've currently added is, in my opinion, sufficiently different to be permissible. Please be very wary of taking text from sources and trying to amend it in order to circumvent copyright; it is far simpler (and more legal!) to try and reproduce the information behind the content in your own words. Yunshui 雲水 07:29, 12 October 2012 (UTC)