Florio Stacy Unitas
Welcome!
edit
|
Signing articles
editWelcome to WP. Please do not sign articles that you write. Articles are not owned by their editor(s), and Wikipedia already provides complete edit history. Coren 23:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Good work on the article about the fonder of FSU's film school. You might want to try and expand the article by talking about his personal life or his work building up the film program. Black Harry 00:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Garrison Dundas
editThe article Garrison Dundas has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 14:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Same for Pamela Punkar. People are not notable enough for encyclopedia entries just because they gave money to Florida State and got their name on a brick or bench. NawlinWiki 16:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Leo Sandon
editAn editor has nominated Leo Sandon, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Sandon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
FSU biographies
editDear Florio, ou have been writing a large number of articles on the faculty at your university--an excellent project. But there is no point in doing the project unless you write the articles sufficiently fully that they will not get immediately deleted from wikipedia. Please read WP:N and WP:PROF, and realize the standard of documentation required. For researchers, you need to give the major publications. for those notable as teachers or otherwise, you need to fulfill those more general requirements. It is a not unreasonable feeling that when such a group of articles are inserted, proper care may not have been taken to select only the suitable ones, and perfectly reasonable WP editors are understandably inclined to delete them.
- I and many other WP eds. feel it our responsibility to save WP articles on notable people from deletion, even if it means doing some of the work ourselves. But you have done so many that we are having difficulty keeping up. Please take a pause in this, and improve the articles that you have already done rather than adding more. then, when you resume, do so more slowly and more carefully . Read the discussions at AfD for your articles, and read the ones that we have been revising for you. Understand what is needed, and do it right. I'll be glad to help you, and I'm sure other will as well. DGG 04:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- I did warn you about this, now is your chance to fix up the others that have been nominated for deletion, such as Mary Hicks and Steve Edwards (Physicist) See my user talk page for a summary of what is needed. DGG (talk) 03:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Duplicate Image:Monumentpondgreen.JPG
editHello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Monumentpondgreen.JPG, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Monumentpondgreen.JPG is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Monumentpondgreen.JPG, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
editHello Florio Stacy Unitas! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 726 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Steve Edwards (physicist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Mary Hicks (professor) for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Hicks (professor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.