Scrubs

edit

Hi, can I ask why you're redirecting huge amounts of Scrubs content without discussion? The articles have been around a while, contain large amounts of content, and are at least somewhat sourced. I'd appreciate it if you at least tried to gain some consensus to do this on the talk page(s) first. ~ mazca t|c 23:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've replied to your reply on my talk page, may as well keep the discussion in one place. Thanks. ~ mazca t|c 22:22, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

October 2008

edit

  Please do not create malicious redirects, as you did with Homer Simpson. They are disruptive and are considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Matthewedwards (talk contribs  email) 22:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Floristan (talk) 22:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Road to Germany

edit

Wow, that's a lot of tags to add for 1 section. Overkill ya think? Dp76764 (talk) 19:08, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit

After investigating a report at Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/PrimeFan, I have come to the conclusion that this account, along with a large number of other accounts, are all being operated by the same person as abusive sockpuppets. Operating multiple accounts is not permitted when they are used to edit the same articles and debates. However, due to the nature of the IP addresses involved, it is possible that some of these users have coincidentally shared a computer or IP address. If this is the case, you may request to be unblocked by emailing the blocking admin or the unblock mailing list with your official University email address. This is to prevent one person from spoofing the admins with multiple free throwaway email accounts such as gmail or yahoomail. (Your email address will not be stored or used other than for verification.) If this is a misunderstanding I apologize in advance, and your account will be unblocked as soon as you provide proof that you are a separate individual. Be advised two checkusers examined this case and agreed on the results.RlevseTalk 02:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)Reply