FlyingNinja1
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Welcome FlyingNinja1!
I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
SPA
editI just wanted to mention that your contributions history speaks for itself and your argument there was about the interpretation of a source, that is legitimate WP business, unlike the many single purpose accounts who only campaign to complain or vote that it's somehow not pseudoscience. No worries, and happy editing, —PaleoNeonate – 05:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
@Paleoneonate, Thanks.
Appreciate it.
Focus on content
editWP:FOC has not been linked but it has been mentioned at the Ayurveda talk page so I'll include the link here for convenience. It can be difficult to always follow but it's important: when someone begins to judge other editors and question their motivations, evidence should also be provided (WP:ASPERSION also has related information). Once that judging game begins it's difficult to assume good faith and it invites other editors to do the same... A number of editors participating there have a long history of working for the encyclopedia in many fields, they're not there because they hate a topic or some people, or because they have a conflict of interest, they only participate because of significant recent disruption by advocates in the topic area. I also forgot to issue standard DS templates so will issue them below. If an editor really misbehaves the first step would be to issue friendly warnings at their talk page. If necessary they can ultimately be reported at WP:ANI or at WP:AE. —PaleoNeonate – 00:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Important standard DS notices
edit
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in complementary and alternative medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.