Welcome!

Hello, Football79, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 
Hello, I noticed that you have edited a College football related article. You may be interested to know that there is a college football WikiProject which you can join if you like. We would love to have you! --MECUtalk 19:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Creating Articles

edit

I see you created an article that definitely belongs in the project. Therefore, you should goto the talk page and put {{WikiProject College football}} there. Then the page will become part of the project. If you want to attempt to rate the pages and classify them as well, you can do that too. See the Assessment page. But generally, DI-AA pages should be Low importance. Thanks for your efforts. MECUtalk 18:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I called them DI-AA. I guess I remembered looking at one of them that used to be I-AA but is now I-A. Anyways, the info you're putting on there is all very basic. There definitely needs some expansion and writing. Some of them would be very short (was it FAU that just started 4 years ago?) compared to schools that have 100+ years of history. But every page needs a starting place. I have intentions to write the Navy and Air Force pages sometime. I hope you've discovered the Master Team Table within the project located at: Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/MasterTeamTable. If you have a favorite team that you'd kind of like to adopt as well, you could get more in-depth with their pages and create season pages for them as well. Just use the year page format. Anyways, keep up the great work. MECUtalk 02:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

CFB WikiProject

edit

Football, I've noticed you've created several college football articles. They are very much appreciated. You could say us a lot of time if after you created the article you placed {{WikiProject College football}} on the Talk page. This puts it in our category so we know it exists. Once again, thanks for all your help!--NMajdantalk 01:42, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

edit

Thanks for the cleanup on the Joe Rose and Jimmy Johnson links in the Don Shula page.

If I knew how they give out stars, I would give you one. CodeCarpenter 20:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Big Ten Football category

edit

Why have you removed nearly all of the pages, contrary to rules calling for discussion first? Rkevins82 04:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm not going to throw the book at you (nor can I). I just saw a raft of deletions and wondered why. To complete the category deletion process, though, you do need to open a discussion page for Category:Big Ten football. No worries. I saw the method to your madness after several articles. Go Gophers, beat Texas Tech! Rkevins82 19:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:Florida Atlantic Owls Helmet.gif

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Florida Atlantic Owls Helmet.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:07, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

College football barnstar

edit
  The College football Barnstar
I, BigDT, present you with the new college football barnstar for your work with college football articles this season. BigDT 22:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

College football team infobox

edit

I'm confused what you're talking about. Can you please provide some links to what you're talking about, especially the disclaimer on the football helmet project? Thanks. --MECUtalk 02:22, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure if using the helmets would be appreciated by the helmet project, and we would have to use them under fair use, which is contentious since it would be considered "replaceable" and therefore violate FUP #1. Also, with him saying "Re-distribution of the images en masse on CD or other media is absolutely prohibited." makes me further believe they wouldn't appeciate it. Even if he were to license his images freely, we would still have to use them under fair use because the designs are most likely owned by the universities (or maybe NCAA, but likely the Uni), though I would believe that we would then be able to use these images on Wikipedia, because it's the logo/design that's copyrighted and there would be no way to get around that. You or I taking a picture would still have the same restrictions. So, my thought is to contact the site owner and specifically ask him to release the images under a free license. Do not have him upload to Commons since the logo would be copyrighted. Be sure to let him pick a free license (I recommend CC-BY-SA-2.5, but any free license will do). See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for help with this, especially under "Images". Until we receive his agreement to freely license the images, I won't work on putting the images into the infobox. I believe you have a high chance of success of getting his permission, especially if you tell him we want only 1, the current helmet of each DI-A school, to be used on 1 page only (the "<School> <Mascot> football" article). If you had him upload the images he allows, with a disclaimer that he is the owner, it is also located at his website, but other images on the website are not licensed under the same license. I would be happy to help you gather all these images, apply the fair use tag, make sure his license is acceptable and write the "stock" fair use rationale we would need. It would be best to have him upload the images, because if you or I did, we would need the email from his forwarded to Wikipedia which could cause snafus. Anyways, contact him, ask him to license his images freely, specifically ask him to say "I release under <license>" (ie, GDFL, CC-BY-SA-2.5, etc). Good luck! --MECUtalk 13:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Howdy again. I happened across New England Patriots and looked at the helmet image at Image:New England Patriots helmet rightface.png and they claimed fair use. If it's good enough for the NFL, it's gotta be good enough for us. Thinking about it more, we'd have to have it under fair use even if that website owner released the images because of the logo. They even have it built in as mandatory to their template at Template:NFL team, where just using this template on a page requires the helmet logo to display. Someone thought ahead and build a naming convention for the images once uploaded. So, if you haven't already asked for permission of the website owner, we could just go this route which I'd be fine with. You should bring this up at the WP:CFB and this could be a large off-season project, if you want help with it. If not, you can do it all yourself too or I'd be glad to help you if you want to keep it simple. My thought would be to upload all the helmet images for pages that have the school infobox page on them, then add it to the template. Since we're dealing with fair use we can't have orphans for more than 7 days. Adding it to the template should be fairly easy to do, especially with the example from the NFL template. Anyways, lemme know your plans and if you want help. (Sorry for kind of over reacting before.) --MECUtalk 15:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to intrude, but I came across this article whilst poking about in hopes of finding some agreement to use the helmet images created at The Helmet Project. Is this what you and MECU are discussing? If so, I'm all for it and would be glad to help as well. I think it would really spiff up the College Football project and lend a sense of continuity to the articles. Pepto gecko 04:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Big Ten newsletter, February 2007

edit

Hello all Big Ten Wikipedians, here's the manual newsletter (becuase I suck with templates :P) on February. As it says on the Wikiproject, this month's main article is the Big Ten Conference, primarily because that article needs so much help right now. Everything seems to be going well so far. I'd be helping more but I had other things I was doing. Glad to see a lot of members joining though. I'm thinking of starting an assessment division of our own, but I'm not sure yet. Give me your opinions on if we should start tagging people as well btw. If you guys wish to start tagging college presidents of them, that would be a good start. The project is still partially in development, so any advice helps. Go Bucks! (and spartans, badgers, wolverines, illini, etc.)--Wizardman 01:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Miami Hurricanes Helmet.gif)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Miami Hurricanes Helmet.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Gophers in CHoF

edit

I don't know of any list. I just know that thoese two are in it. I am surprise the CFL HOF dose not do any kind of list by colleges. Perhaps someone could send an email to the hof and see if they could help Smith03 13:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I sent the CF HOF an email about it yesterday. I will let you know what if anything I hear back on Smith03 17:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Arizona State Sun Devils Helmet.gif)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Arizona State Sun Devils Helmet.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Template question on Gopher football page

edit

Hi - I got your message about the seasons template that you removed and I later put back. I probably should have come straight to you instead of just posting a message about it on Minnesota Golden Gophers football's talk page. I asked about it there and when nobody objected, I put it back on the page. I understand what you're saying about it, but I think it works better to use that page as the main jumping off point to all information about the team instead of the category page. On that page, everything is listed in alphabetical order instead of being arranged how we would like it. I also suspect that most people using Wikipedia don't use the category pages - I had been on here for 6 months before I ever looked at one.

Having said that, maybe there's another way to accomplish that other than including the template on the page. I'm certainly open to suggestions to make the articles good and easy to navigate. Gopherguy | Talk 15:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BYU Helmet.gif

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:BYU Helmet.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football December 2007 Newsletter

edit

The December 2007 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Minnesota Helmet.gif

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Minnesota Helmet.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football January 2008 Newsletter

edit

The January 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football February 2008 Newsletter

edit

The February 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football March 2008 Newsletter

edit

The March 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:18, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Invite

edit
 
Century Tower

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Jccort (talk) 03:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Minnesota Helmet.gif)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Minnesota Helmet.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:12, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football April 2008 Newsletter

edit

The April 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football May 2008 Newsletter

edit

The May 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Limerick Vikings football

edit

I have nominated Category:Limerick Vikings football (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football June 2008 Newsletter

edit

The June 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:22, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football July 2008 Newsletter

edit

The July 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:27, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football August 2008 Newsletter

edit

The August 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:30, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football September 2008 Newsletter

edit

The September 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football October 2008 Newsletter

edit

The October 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football December 2008 Newsletter

edit

The December 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Categories

edit

When you are adding categories, you don't have to put their name after each category; that is what the DEFAULTSORT above the categories is for. Jackal4 (talk) 20:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football January 2009 Newsletter

edit

The January 2009 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject College football February 2009 Newsletter

edit

The February 2009 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Category:Players of American football from Minnesota

edit

Why not just "American football players from Minnesota"?►Chris NelsonHolla! 23:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello Football79! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Don Lucia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

College Football Project request

edit

Hello! You are listed as an active member of the College Football Project! We have a large number of unreferenced biographies of living persons, but it works out to be just two or three articles per active participant. I've divided up the articles that need help and put them in a table on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Unreferenced BLPs. Please assist the project by researching and sourcing the articles that have been "assigned" (so to speak) to you.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:49, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of D.C. Explosion

edit
 

The article D.C. Explosion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N and has no independent reliable sources, potential COI and ADV as well.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paul McDonald (talk) 21:58, 21 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ronnie Lee (football coach)

edit
 

The article Ronnie Lee (football coach) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable college football coach

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tassedethe (talk) 19:10, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kevin Cosgrove (American football)

edit
 

The article Kevin Cosgrove (American football) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Assistant coaches are not presumed to be notable and, having had a look for sources, I can't find any significant in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources, so I don't believe Cosgrove meets the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jenks24 (talk) 17:46, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Travis Cole for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Travis Cole is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Cole until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cardinal Mooney High School (Youngstown, Ohio), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages WBA and CFL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Football79. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Football79. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Football79. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply