Forbesy 777

Style issues with Australian TV articles

Hi, thanks for your good work on these. I've been going through them making partly script-operated and partly manual changes. Just a few points:

• Some of the older ones introduced rafts of flag icons, which I've replaced with the country names (regrettably not quite in the right positions); the style guide discourages over-emphasis on nationality, and it's not immediately clear why this is of such importance in the tables where used.
• Em dashes, and in a few cases hyphens, are sometimes used for year ranges; I've fixed these. The button for this is underneath the edit box in all cases, or the dash script can easily be loaded (ask me how). Straight-glyph apostrophes are mandated, not curlies (don't ask me why ...).
• Subtitles lower case after the first character, unless there's a proper name.

I'm also pinging User:Whats_new?

My best, Tony (talk) 09:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much for all the advice. Unfortunately though, I do the majority of my editing via mobile so I'm not presented with dash and apostrophe options so I'll just have to leave any edits involving them until I can do it on my PC. Thanks again, Forbesy 777 (talk) 01:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Australian TV station articles

Hi. In regards to your recent edits on MTN (TV station), I applause your efforts in rewriting parts of the article. However, the information you added to the introduction was already featured under the "History" section. In addition, introductions are meant to be just that, an introduction to an article/topic instead of an in-depth list of detail (that can be saved for the main body of the article). Also, the page move that you made from MTN to MTN/AMN/MDN was rather uncalled for and goes against the current Manual of Style already in place on other similar articles.

The multiple station names are only used for two stations that have been merged and operate effectively as one single station, an example being GTS/BKN. Both are two stations owned by Southern Cross TV that are Seven affiliates with the same programming and operations. You are unintentionally getting confused with supplementary stations, which in GTS/BKN's case are SGS/SCN and GDS/BDN. These supplementary stations operate from GTS/BKN, but are affiliates with Ten and Nine respectively (their details are also included within the article). As such, in articles such as this, the primary station is relative to the page name, while the supplementary stations are included in the article as they operate from the main station, but are not separate. If you have any questions concerning this, please ask me. Regards. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 13:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Replied at User talk:Nick Mitchell 98. Forbesy 777 (talk) 00:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I thank you for your edit to List of digital television channels in Australia, however, I just wanted to double check the LCNs you listed for MTN station with 7TWO on LCN 66 and 7mate on LCN 60. The LCNs have not been contested in the long period that they have been listed, and I just wanted to double check that this is correct. Do you live in Griffith or the M.I.A.? Regards. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 08:13, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Replied at User talk:Nick Mitchell 98. Forbesy 777 (talk) 05:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Smooth TV Channel Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Smooth TV Channel Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Have You Been Paying Attention?

Hey, I noticed on the Have You Been Paying Attention? you added the cast section with episode wins. However, listing episode appearences like that are generally frowned upon because it may breach WP:TVCAST and it might be removed by other editors. I don't have an issue with it, but just thought I'd give you the heads up in case you wanted to make any changes or prepare a justification for it should it be challenged. -- Whats new?^(talk) 01:31, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Replied at User talk:Whats new?. Forbesy 777 (talk) 03:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Forbesy 777. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Australian News Channel

Hi, I've reverted your edit to Australian News Channel in which you removed Sky News Weather as being owned by the channel. As you'll note in reviewing recent references already in that article, in addition to the shareholdings register of the channel, its ownership was transferred from Foxtel to ANC during News Corp's purchase of ANC. -- Whats new?^(talk) 04:03, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

@Whats new?: Hi Whats New?, Thank you for the message and apologies for the delay in replying. Thank you for reverting my edit. I was unaware they were included in the purchase, as I was only going by the information in the Sky News Weather Channel and A-PAC articles, which obviously are outdated. I will attempt to update these articles when I have some spare time, if no one beats me to it that is. Have a great weekend, Forbesy 777 (talk) 01:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

No problem. I don't believe A-PAC was included however so its owner remains Foxtel, just operated by Sky News. -- Whats new?^(talk) 03:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

@Whats new?: This is the only reference (although not necessarily the most reliable source) I have been able to find to explicitly say that Weather (as well as A-PAC) were acquired by News Corp in the purchase. Forbesy 777 (talk) 06:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

See here -- Whats new?^(talk) 23:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

@Whats new?: Even a reliable source like TV Tonight has reported A-PAC was included in the purchase - just not as explicitly as the former ref. A shareholders list isn't necessarily up to date or reliable. Forbesy 777 (talk) 03:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Well if you'd like to debate the point further I'm happy to, but I'd prefer to go by the Foxtel shareholders list in regards to actual ownership -- Whats new?^(talk) 04:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fox League Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fox League Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Forbesy 777. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Forbesy 777. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Nat Geo People Logo.jpg

The file File:Nat Geo People Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 07:47, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Foxtel 3D

The article Foxtel 3D has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NTV, since it is currently a stub. It also currently has only 2 references, one from Foxtel themselves and the other reference from TV Tonight.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 02:54, 17 September 2023 (UTC)