Fortnite-Fan-222

A317 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, A317, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:33, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A317 (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A317 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:A317, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 07:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A317 (July 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Eagleash was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: It is quite clear from previous versions that this is intended as humour. Please do not continue.

Eagleash (talk) 10:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Fortnite-Fan-222! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 10:22, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Blocked

You ignored the advice (above) from Eagleash, and persisted with your little fun (adding a bogus photo with a fictional caption). Therefore:

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

-- Hoary (talk) 02:18, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Fortnite-Fan-222, thank you for your mail. But as it says above, in order for you to be free to edit, you have to post an "unblock" template on this page, with a good reason. Then some other administrator (not me) will look at the stated reason, and will or won't "unblock" you. -- Hoary (talk) 13:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Fortnite-Fan-222, thank you for your second mail. Please see above: "If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, [...] Your reason here ~~~~" (Note that you are currently able to edit this user talk page of yours, even while blocked from editing elsewhere.) -- Hoary (talk) 03:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:A317

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:A317. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BilCat (talk) 02:19, 23 July 2020 (UTC)