User talk:FrB.TG/Archive 6
This is an archive of past discussions about User:FrB.TG. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
A barnstar for you!
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Thank you for your GA review on Kalki Koechlin! You sure did go the extra mile to be nice throughout the review!- Numerounovedant Talk 18:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC) |
- Thank you! :) -- Frankie talk 18:43, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
why you remove
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6LyTybfN8k
thats why i wrote its a gossip
why you remove — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.203.61.60 (talk) 07:23, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
why remove
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6LyTybfN8k
thats why i wrote its a gossip
why you remove
- If it's a WP:GOSSIP, you didn't need to write it in the first place. -- Frankie talk 17:39, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
FRB, I badly need your input and some eye on the above article. Please help. —IB [ Poke ] 20:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- @IndianBio: What help do you need with the article? Could you be a little more specific? -- Frankie talk 17:23, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- FRB, the lead section is all the help that I need. I don't know how much you are aware of Madonna's bio and the career, but suggestion on the structure etc would be needed keeping in mind the FLC. —IB [ Poke ] 17:24, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- I am not quite good with writing the lead of an article of this kind (I know how much I struggled for Taylor Swift's one) but since it's for the Queen of Pop, I would in every way help you take it to FLC. Still I would need to do some research for the sake of accuracy and comprehensiveness. -- Frankie talk 17:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Please let me know your ideas, I will try to implement them. —IB [ Poke ] 17:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Will help you and let you know soon. -- Frankie talk 17:51, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Please let me know your ideas, I will try to implement them. —IB [ Poke ] 17:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- I am not quite good with writing the lead of an article of this kind (I know how much I struggled for Taylor Swift's one) but since it's for the Queen of Pop, I would in every way help you take it to FLC. Still I would need to do some research for the sake of accuracy and comprehensiveness. -- Frankie talk 17:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- FRB, the lead section is all the help that I need. I don't know how much you are aware of Madonna's bio and the career, but suggestion on the structure etc would be needed keeping in mind the FLC. —IB [ Poke ] 17:24, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 January 2016
- News and notes: Geshuri steps down from the Board
- In the media: Media coverage of the Arnnon Geshuri no-confidence vote
- Recent research: Bursty edits; how politics beat religion but then lost to sports; notability as a glass ceiling
- Traffic report: Death and taxes
- Featured content: This week's featured content
GA Review
Although now I feel like a bit of a headache for you, but, could you take up Randeep Hooda's GA review? I go back to college in a couple of days and want to get the review done ASAP as I won't be active (once I go back to college), and the article has been of good quality for quiet some time now. Take a look only if you feel up for it and have time to spare. Thank You! Numerounovedant Talk 8:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Numerounovedant: I am currently busy with my nominations but you can ask user Jaguar. -- Frankie talk 05:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you Numerounovedant Talk 7:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Two Barnstars
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
For getting to articles (List of awards and nominations received by Katy Perry and List of songs recorded by Taylor Swift promoted to FL on the same day! Nobody I know of has ever accomplished such a feat before!! Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC) |
The Teamwork Barnstar | ||
For helping me get KP's accolades to FL (as noted above) :D. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC) |
- Glad that someone noticed something I achieved yesterday for the second time. Besides, thanks for two barnstars, much appreciated. :-) -- Frankie talk 05:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Congrats guys! —IB [ Poke ] 12:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you! :) After TayTay, Madonna next. -- Frankie talk 13:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Congrats guys! —IB [ Poke ] 12:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Civility Barnstar | |
You seem to be getting no end of these lately! Just a thanks for withdrawing your TFL request to appease another user, and prevent any escalation. Harrias talk 18:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC) |
- Thanks a lot! -- Frankie talk 19:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
A beer for you!
Just a heads up on the work you've been doing. Even if you might often get criticism at FAC/FLC (who doesn't?..) overall your efforts are commendable. You give off a great vibe too, a friendly guy who I think everybody likes, which on a hostile site like wikipedia makes a considerable difference. Sorry if I haven't always had the time to review your work or comment, but your efforts and positive demeanour have not gone unnoticed. Keep up the good work and may your quality of writing continue to improve. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC) |
- I didn't know that I would receive this from someone like you, truly and greatly appreciated. Don't worry about the reviews. I think it's okay given the amount of articles you produce. Despite that, you gave a lot of time to one of my articles that is very much appreciated. -- Frankie talk 17:58, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 February 2016
- From the editors: Help wanted
- Special report: Board chair and new trustee speak with the Signpost
- Arbitration report: Catching up on arbitration
- Traffic report: Bowled
- Featured content: This week's featured content
My FLC
I have nominated this for FLC. I hope to get some constructive comments from you, for further improvement of the list. I would appreciate it. Thanks!Krish | Talk 14:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- I had resolved all your comments on the flc. Thanks.Krish | Talk 18:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Your comments were resolved at the FLC, so it would be better if you could strike the rest or put the resolved comments template.Krish | Talk 13:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- The RC template displayed an error which was why I had to remove it. -- Frankie talk 17:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Your comments were resolved at the FLC, so it would be better if you could strike the rest or put the resolved comments template.Krish | Talk 13:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
List of awards and nominations received by Adele
Look ing for help from an editor, on Adele Awards page. I have found she (adele has four Guinness World Records that are not listed...Taylor Swift lists her Guinness awards! why not Adele....
First female to land two singles and two albums in the U.K. top five simultaneously 2011
21, first album in U.K. chart history to sell 3 million copies in one calender year 2011
Most consecutive weeks with the #1 Album in the U.K. for a solo female with 11 weeks at rhe top 2011
Hello, fastest time for a music video to reach one billion views on YouTube
She (Adele) also Won the Phoenix film Critics Society Awards 2012 for Best Original Song (Skyfall) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.116.227 (talk) 00:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- I'll see if the records set or broken have enteries in the Guinness book. If so, I'll add them. Thanks for noting. -- Frankie talk 15:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 February 2016
- News and notes: Another WMF departure
- In the media: Jeb Bush swings at Wikipedia and connects
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: A river of revilement
Could you help with this. I wish to nominate it for FL. Any suggestions are appreciated. --Inside the Valley (talk) 13:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Inside the Valley: Sorry I am not aware of his career. I will tell you one thing from a quick glance: please get rid of those column headers in the middle of the table. Impressive work on such a long list and good luck at the FLC! -- Frankie talk 22:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- UPDATE: I have done some tweaks in the article, which you may or may not like so feel free to revert if you are not okay with them. If possible, have someone copy-edit it who could improve it more. On a side note, I believe he was scene stealer in Company. -- Frankie talk 22:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your work and suggestions, you did great. I removed those column headers. The list is already copyedited by User:Corinne after I submitted it in WP:GOCE/REQ. Have a question, yesterday I had submitted it for peer review (see here) under the topic "Lists", do I need to change the topic to "Arts" ?. --Inside the Valley (talk) 06:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- I think both are okay but "Lists" sounds more relevant. -- Frankie talk 07:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your work and suggestions, you did great. I removed those column headers. The list is already copyedited by User:Corinne after I submitted it in WP:GOCE/REQ. Have a question, yesterday I had submitted it for peer review (see here) under the topic "Lists", do I need to change the topic to "Arts" ?. --Inside the Valley (talk) 06:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. :) --Inside the Valley (talk) 14:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Inside the Valley I just wanted to tell you that I did not spend much time going through the lists. I don't know much about films, and I figured you did, and that you would have checked titles and dates yourself. I concentrated on everything before the lists. Corinne (talk) 00:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey!
I saw your recent edit summary on Swift's accolades page "God Saves Music". Any particular reasons for it? Are you referring to her second and well-deserved Album of The Year win?Krish | Talk 05:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- I like TayTay's music but I just don't think that 1989 is an Album of the Year material. It was apretty good album but I think it should've been Kendrick Lamar's To Pimp a Butterfly. Clearly the Grammy is better judge than me so whatever. -- Frankie talk 07:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- I have not listened to Kendrick Lamar's To Pimp a Butterfly, so I cannot judge. I wasn't even aware of his existence until Swift released "Bad Blood". To be honest, 1989 was the clear winner even before the nominations were announced. I was rooting for her and became very happy when she won. She is the one (along with Adele) who can sell physical albums and she deserves it. Also, If reviews were the only parameter then Carol should have won Best Film Awards this year and not The Revenant and Spotlight. So, no one should doubt her win. Awards are subjective and people always will be divided.Krish | Talk 08:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- I am not saying it because of the reviews but because of the quality of Lamar's concept album. Anyway, I am happy for her wins maybe there was something in 1989 that wasn't in TPAB which made it the winner. -- Frankie talk 08:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- I hope you don't ask the same question next year, when Adele will win Album of They Year for 25. Haha...Krish | Talk 08:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- I am not saying it because of the reviews but because of the quality of Lamar's concept album. Anyway, I am happy for her wins maybe there was something in 1989 that wasn't in TPAB which made it the winner. -- Frankie talk 08:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- I have not listened to Kendrick Lamar's To Pimp a Butterfly, so I cannot judge. I wasn't even aware of his existence until Swift released "Bad Blood". To be honest, 1989 was the clear winner even before the nominations were announced. I was rooting for her and became very happy when she won. She is the one (along with Adele) who can sell physical albums and she deserves it. Also, If reviews were the only parameter then Carol should have won Best Film Awards this year and not The Revenant and Spotlight. So, no one should doubt her win. Awards are subjective and people always will be divided.Krish | Talk 08:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Neerja
You seen this film? It's really an Outstanding film. I literally cried on couple of moments. I hope I could say the same thing about Sonam Kapoor's performance, good, but not extraordinary like it should have been. Another actress (Kangana Ranaut maybe) would have given an award winning performance. Still Kapoor's best to date by a large margin. However, Shabana Azmi owns the film. See ASAP.Krish | Talk 18:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I will see the film starring an actress whose biography I have written in Wikipedia. I have not seen any of her films but this will be the first. -- Frankie talk 18:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah go and see it. But after that, don't see her previous films. LOL. Though, you can see her two films: Raanjhana and Khoobsurat, she was good in them and both the films are well-made.Krish | Talk 18:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Not just yet. I don't think that the film is releasing in theatres in Germany so I would have to wait for its digital release. -- Frankie talk 18:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- I saw Spotlight yesterday, staying with my cousin in Delhi right now, and what an amazing film it was. This should easily win Best Picture. I'm happy that Rachael McAdams had finally received her long overdue Oscar nomination, so very well-deserved. What an amazing cast! I'm also planning to watch all other Oscar nominated films, during my one week visit here. Since, In my city (where I'm studying), these accalaimed dramas barely release.Krish | Talk 18:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- McAdams has an Oscars nod? That's so fetch! -- Frankie talk 18:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- I saw Spotlight yesterday, staying with my cousin in Delhi right now, and what an amazing film it was. This should easily win Best Picture. I'm happy that Rachael McAdams had finally received her long overdue Oscar nomination, so very well-deserved. What an amazing cast! I'm also planning to watch all other Oscar nominated films, during my one week visit here. Since, In my city (where I'm studying), these accalaimed dramas barely release.Krish | Talk 18:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Not just yet. I don't think that the film is releasing in theatres in Germany so I would have to wait for its digital release. -- Frankie talk 18:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah go and see it. But after that, don't see her previous films. LOL. Though, you can see her two films: Raanjhana and Khoobsurat, she was good in them and both the films are well-made.Krish | Talk 18:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
The answer to your question...
...is yes, you are allowed to move comments to the talk page. It makes it easier for all concerned when counting up the votes. A cursory note telling those concerned about the move, together with a link, is good manners. CassiantoTalk 21:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for replying despite me reverting my question. BTW congrats on your recent FA on, er, someone. -- Frankie talk 23:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- No problem, and thank you. He most certainly wasn't "someone" in this country; he was one of the greatest stage actors in the UK, although he was not as well-known as Olivier, Richardson, et al... Hopefully, now he is a FA, people will learn more about him and he will become somebody rather than just someone. CassiantoTalk 00:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Pete's Dragon
Seen the teaser trailer? My god this year can't get better, looking at the lined up films. This is definitely top of my list now after The Jungke Book, Zootopia and Finding Dory. Plus, a live action Dragon on big screen after so long. This will definitely give a strong competition to our beloved Khaleesi's three children this year.Krish | Talk 07:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Wasn't aware of the film until your message. I just saw the trailer, which looks pretty captivating. -- Frankie talk 12:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Robin Williams fiilmography or
Hi there,
I was planning to improve Robin Williams's filmography so that I could nominate it for featured list status by March 31st. Would you like to help me in the tables? I would appreciate the help.
--Birdienest81 (talk) 05:58, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for asking he was such a great actor loved his performances especially the Good Will Hunting one. Anyway, I'll help you this evening. -- Frankie talk 06:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- PS I don't understand your specificity of date submission. You can submit it any day you want to I mean it's not TFL or something. -- Frankie talk 06:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Emma Stone
Please provide these reliable sources that state they're still together. Rusted AutoParts 18:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Please provide a reliable source that has her confessing it. -- Frankie talk 18:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- sigh. We don't need her "confession". Please provide the sources that contradict the claims they're broken up. Rusted AutoParts 18:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oh dear! Then whose confession do you need; sources'? Since she has not said anything about it it's better to say that sources reported so. Please don't make it such a big issue, which it isn't. -- Frankie talk 18:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- I know, you're making it a big deal by asking for a confession from Stone which we absolutely do not need. You claim there's reliable sources that contradict the ones about the breakup, please provide them, or that whole section is being deleted, leaving only the reliably sourced sentence of "She dated Andrew Garfield from 2011-2015". Rusted AutoParts 18:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- So that big quote from her does not say anything that contradicts the claim? Also, is this some kind of threat: "Or that whole section is being deleted"? -- Frankie talk 18:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- It contradicts all sides. It's pretty much just her discussing why she doesn't talk about her personal life. It's useless. And if you interpret it as a threat (it wasn't), that's up to you. Just stating we have reliable sources stating they broke up, and none (yet, once you provide them) stating otherwise. Rusted AutoParts 18:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Now I don't have to list those sources to prove myself right that too for a slight tweak. Do whatever the hell you want to do with article as I am done with it. Strange, as for a moment I thought I could take it to WP:GA. -- Frankie talk 18:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Well, you said you had reliable sources, I was just curious as to what those were. But as you refuse to provide them, I'll adjust the article to reflect the info we do have. Rusted AutoParts 19:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Well, congratulations on your triumph! -- Frankie talk 19:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Act butthurt all you want, the only thing stopping you pushing this to GA is you providing those sources, but you refused. We have sources saying they're done. You said there's ones saying otherwise. So it's all up to you to convince me and others that they're actually not done. Rusted AutoParts 19:05, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Alright, I apologize for my immature behavior. I believe in discussing politely but I lost my cool today. -- Frankie talk 19:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Act butthurt all you want, the only thing stopping you pushing this to GA is you providing those sources, but you refused. We have sources saying they're done. You said there's ones saying otherwise. So it's all up to you to convince me and others that they're actually not done. Rusted AutoParts 19:05, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Well, congratulations on your triumph! -- Frankie talk 19:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Well, you said you had reliable sources, I was just curious as to what those were. But as you refuse to provide them, I'll adjust the article to reflect the info we do have. Rusted AutoParts 19:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Now I don't have to list those sources to prove myself right that too for a slight tweak. Do whatever the hell you want to do with article as I am done with it. Strange, as for a moment I thought I could take it to WP:GA. -- Frankie talk 18:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- It contradicts all sides. It's pretty much just her discussing why she doesn't talk about her personal life. It's useless. And if you interpret it as a threat (it wasn't), that's up to you. Just stating we have reliable sources stating they broke up, and none (yet, once you provide them) stating otherwise. Rusted AutoParts 18:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- So that big quote from her does not say anything that contradicts the claim? Also, is this some kind of threat: "Or that whole section is being deleted"? -- Frankie talk 18:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- I know, you're making it a big deal by asking for a confession from Stone which we absolutely do not need. You claim there's reliable sources that contradict the ones about the breakup, please provide them, or that whole section is being deleted, leaving only the reliably sourced sentence of "She dated Andrew Garfield from 2011-2015". Rusted AutoParts 18:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oh dear! Then whose confession do you need; sources'? Since she has not said anything about it it's better to say that sources reported so. Please don't make it such a big issue, which it isn't. -- Frankie talk 18:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- sigh. We don't need her "confession". Please provide the sources that contradict the claims they're broken up. Rusted AutoParts 18:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Trust me, I cannot attempt to say i'm the pinnacle of politeness. I got agitated as well and I apologize. That particular section just kept on getting edited by IP's constantly altering it so I got a bit scrutinizing when it came to be edited again. Rusted AutoParts 21:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Academy Award trophy.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Academy Award trophy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for saying "I appreciate Eric's effort to create the list" on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Artists and Groups who have won the Grammy Award for Album of the Year more than once as the main credited artist. Based on this and the other comments I see here on your talk page it seems that you are one of the good guys. Too bad there are so many bad guys that make participating in Wikipedia suck so much. Eric Cable ! Talk 13:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, nice to meet you. Please don't be discouraged by the nomination. Those "bad guys" are only following Wikipedia's strict policy and guidelines. I can understand that Wikipedia can be a major pain in the neck sometimes but you will understand when you spend some more time here. -- Frankie talk 13:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Oscars
Who do you think will win the most famous prize on this planet? Categories other than leading actor and actress (its a well-know fact; DiCaprio and Larson).Krish | Talk 17:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- I don't know the best film prize may go to Revenant or the one with Christian Bale. Best director too to the Revenant director, Alejandro. Best actor as you said is for sure reserved for DiCaprio. I wish best supporting actor goes to Mr. Bale (though it might go to Sylvester if not him then Mark) and it would be so fetch if
McAdamswins her nod (may not happen) but it is for sure reserved for 'The Danish Girl actress or maybe, maybe Kate Winslet. I wish Gaga wins the best original song category. -- Frankie talk 18:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)- Yes, Gaga will definitely win that Oscar. Coming to main awards, I think Best Picture should go to Mad Max: Fury Road, Best Director to George Miller because this was easily the best film of 2015 after Carol, and Inside Out (no Best Picture nominations). I mean Fury Road is an stunning piece of cinema, and an experience of a kind. Seeing the visuals, one can say how much Miller deserves that golden warrior. George Miller is most deserving for Best Director. Spotlight and The Big Short deserves to win after Mad Max, and not The Revenant. It is stunning, arty but not as good as those above listed films. Sadly it seems both The Revenant and Alejandro Innaritu's names are on those ballots. I wish Kate Winslet takes that award, though I really loved Alicia Vikander in The Danish Girl. Supporting Actor is a toss between Bale, Stallone and Rylance. But all three are deserving enough.Krish | Talk 19:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Films like Max Mad never win awards like best picture I am surprised that it was even nominated. The dark knight wasn't even nominated. -- Frankie talk 19:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sadly that's true. The Dark Knight should have been nominated and won the Best Picture. It was much better than Slumdog Millionaire. It so sad that The Academy only favours dramas, and biopics. They have snuubed every other genre from comedies to science fiction to superhero films. More than acting categories, it lacks diversity in Best Picture nominations/winners.Krish | Talk 05:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Many science fiction movies have been nominated for Best Picture (Inception, Star Wars IV, ET, Gravity and The Martian are some examples) but none have won. Only one fantasy movie (Return of the King) has won, while winners Forrest Gump, One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest and Birdman were quite light in tone. If all those "hallucinations" that Riggan sees in Birdman are actually true, it is another fantasy to win Best Picture. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sadly that's true. The Dark Knight should have been nominated and won the Best Picture. It was much better than Slumdog Millionaire. It so sad that The Academy only favours dramas, and biopics. They have snuubed every other genre from comedies to science fiction to superhero films. More than acting categories, it lacks diversity in Best Picture nominations/winners.Krish | Talk 05:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Films like Max Mad never win awards like best picture I am surprised that it was even nominated. The dark knight wasn't even nominated. -- Frankie talk 19:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, Gaga will definitely win that Oscar. Coming to main awards, I think Best Picture should go to Mad Max: Fury Road, Best Director to George Miller because this was easily the best film of 2015 after Carol, and Inside Out (no Best Picture nominations). I mean Fury Road is an stunning piece of cinema, and an experience of a kind. Seeing the visuals, one can say how much Miller deserves that golden warrior. George Miller is most deserving for Best Director. Spotlight and The Big Short deserves to win after Mad Max, and not The Revenant. It is stunning, arty but not as good as those above listed films. Sadly it seems both The Revenant and Alejandro Innaritu's names are on those ballots. I wish Kate Winslet takes that award, though I really loved Alicia Vikander in The Danish Girl. Supporting Actor is a toss between Bale, Stallone and Rylance. But all three are deserving enough.Krish | Talk 19:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
I have no idea why you were using a dab page as a talk page, but for obvious reasons I've removed your edit there. Doug Weller talk 10:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for reverting it. Actually I wanted to leave the message on someone's talk page but for some reason after logging in the iPad took me to the page and I mistakenly left it in the dab page. -- Frankie talk 13:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Seems to be a known software issue. Doug Weller talk 15:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
TFL notification
Hi, Frankie. I'm just posting to let you know that List of songs recorded by Lady Gaga – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for March 28. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
88th Academy Awards
Did you watch it?Krish | Talk 12:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nope, but the winners were the ones who I expected to win except one person, who I rooted for the most. -- Frankie talk 12:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nevermind. Priyanka Chopra presented Award for Best Film Editing to Mad Max: Fury Road. That was so cool. Plus, Chopra has appeared on all Best Dressed list for her Oscar look. "Priyanka Chopra Oscar dress" was second most searched this year, which is even more cool.Krish | Talk 12:35, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Good for her! -- Frankie talk 12:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Plus, Mad Max won six, Leo, Alicia and Brie won. Yay. Miller, Stallone lost. However most unexpected and well-deserved award was for "Best Special Effects", which went to Ex-Machina. It deserved that award very much. However, Lady Gaga's loss was unexpected.Krish | Talk 12:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- I guess Ex Machina is an example of how visually impressive sci-fis can be made without huge budgets. And I am indeed surprised that "Writing on the Wall" won; it didn't receive such great reviews either. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- After hearing "Till It Happens To You" (Yesterday) for the first time, I thought it was the most amazingly written song of all five nominee. "Earned It" would be second, but "WONTW"? Was that a joke? It's like Minions receiving a Best Picture nomination. LOL. This wasn't fair to Gaga. Was this given to make Sam Smith, the first openly gay man to win an Oscar?Krish | Talk 09:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Looks like you made the same mistake as Smith did. -- Frankie talk 10:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- I guess Ex Machina is an example of how visually impressive sci-fis can be made without huge budgets. And I am indeed surprised that "Writing on the Wall" won; it didn't receive such great reviews either. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Plus, Mad Max won six, Leo, Alicia and Brie won. Yay. Miller, Stallone lost. However most unexpected and well-deserved award was for "Best Special Effects", which went to Ex-Machina. It deserved that award very much. However, Lady Gaga's loss was unexpected.Krish | Talk 12:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Good for her! -- Frankie talk 12:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nevermind. Priyanka Chopra presented Award for Best Film Editing to Mad Max: Fury Road. That was so cool. Plus, Chopra has appeared on all Best Dressed list for her Oscar look. "Priyanka Chopra Oscar dress" was second most searched this year, which is even more cool.Krish | Talk 12:35, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Then why did he announced it in front of millions of people? I didn't know who was/is the first of any category other than most wins for Best Actor (Daniel Day-Lewis), Best Actress (Katherine Hepburn), and stuffs like that. I'm not a racist or sexist or a judgemental person.Krish | Talk 10:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Writer's Barnstar | |
For your recent promotion of Sonam Kapoor, she is underestimated as an actress, but she finally got a bronze star. —IB [ Poke ] 15:33, 4 March 2016 (UTC) |
- Thanks! I really cannot tell how she is as an actress as I have not watched any of her films. -- Frankie talk 16:45, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
I only worked on one in the Overview of Katy Perry but it is my first FT :). Yay us. — Calvin999 09:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC) |
- And it's my second. :) Also, I am glad to have two promotions on the same day--a featured topic and a featured article. -- Frankie talk 14:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- Double congrats :D! Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you! Regarding the former, it's mainly your triumph so many many congratulations. -- Frankie talk 21:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- Double congrats :D! Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For bringing Sonam Kapoor to FA status. Commendable job! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:02, 6 March 2016 (UTC) |
Thank you and everyone for all the appreciations. -- Frankie talk 12:04, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Congratulations!
Featured Article
Kailash29792 (talk) 10:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC) |
Thank you! Much appreciated. -- Frankie talk 11:08, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- Many congratulations, FrB.TG!! Very happy to see this. Fun fact: After I worked on Vidya Balan's article, she won the Filmfare and National Film Award for The Dirty Picture. After Deepika Padukone's article passed, she won the Filmfare Award for Ram-Leela, and after Kangana Ranaut's article passed, she won both the Filmfare and NFA for Queen. Given the trend, next year it will be Sonam's turn for Neerja. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 07:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I don't think so. Sonam Kapoor was average in Neerja, still her best. It was the film which was brilliant. Next year, either Aishwarya or Kangana are going to win all awards. Kangana's role in Rangoon is nothing sort of spectacular. But who knows, if Sonam can get a Filmfare nomination for her panned performance in Dolly Ki Doli. I wont be surprised if she won Filmfare Critics Award, like Alia, who was undeserving and still won just because Kjo paid for it.Krish | Talk 09:10, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Congratulations, Frank. Keep up the good work. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 00:08, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Very well done sir!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank ya'll. Btw Dr. Blofeld I have watched all of the recommended films (alongside some other ones) listed here. -- Frankie talk 12:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Very well done sir!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:41, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Congratulations, Frank. Keep up the good work. — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 00:08, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
A cupcake for you!
For getting Sonam Kapoor to FA status. :) Do watch Neerja. Also, Good luck for Gaga. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC) |
- BTW do you have GA plans for Emma Stone, she's one of my favourites. I could have worked on her article, but currently i'm too busy in my real life. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you Yash! :) I will surely watch Neerja and it's nice to see female oriented films such as Kahaani, Queen, NH10, Mary Kom and Neerja do quite well at the box-office. I expect more of them. And regarding Stone, yes I will expand her article at some point. She is my favorite too. -- Frankie talk 12:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
For your amazing work on featured content. Congratulations! Krish | Talk 09:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC) |
- Thank you Krish! :) -- Frankie talk 12:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Wishes
Happy Maha Shivaratri! | |
Wishing you, your family, and your dear ones a very happy Maha Shivaratri! Keep yourself very happy and joyful, away from sorrows and worries in this moment, something which Nataraja teaches!
PS: I don't know whether you are aware of this festival or not, but i'm sure you will be happy with this gesture of WikiLove. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC) |
- Thank you. I am aware of some Hindu festivals but unfortunately this is not among them. But I really appreciate the gesture. -- Frankie talk 12:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Kalki Koechlin
Hey Frankie! I nominated Kalki Koechlin's article for WP:FA, and I would appreciate your comments on the article!(If you have some time to spare) It has been a long time without any comments now. Thank you! NumerounovedantTalk 11:35, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- I will once I write Gaga's list. Make sure to invite the previous reviewer Cassianto. -- Frankie talk 14:06, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- I am a little lost here! The previous reviewer was Vensatry, but his user page has been deleted... Is he the one you are referring to? (Thanks for all the help) NumerounovedantTalk 18:06, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- I am referring to the one with the username "Cassianto" (as seen above) [1] but you can also invite the other reviewer. -- Frankie talk 18:11, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes I figured... but the other reviewer deleted his user page? NumerounovedantTalk 18:17, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- I am referring to the one with the username "Cassianto" (as seen above) [1] but you can also invite the other reviewer. -- Frankie talk 18:11, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- I am a little lost here! The previous reviewer was Vensatry, but his user page has been deleted... Is he the one you are referring to? (Thanks for all the help) NumerounovedantTalk 18:06, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 16:08, 14 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.