FrancisFranck
Welcome!
editHi, FrancisFranck. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hitro talk 19:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
FrancisFranck, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi FrancisFranck! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
January 2014
editYour addition to Balloon catheter has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 18:57, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Ureteric balloon catheter.jpeg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ureteric balloon catheter.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 21:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Balloon catheter in the ureter.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Balloon catheter in the ureter.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 21:12, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Image licences
editHi Francis Franck, Thank you for your message. Is see that the image page notes an email has been sent to the OTRS team regarding the license. This is one way to fix the issue - as an OTRS volunteer will mark the image as permission received (in time, there is a backlog usually). The other way is to mark on the website that the image comes from that the image is under a free license. I frequently see this issue with donations of images that are hosted on webpages, that contain the statement (c) all-rights-reserved. In the interim I've removed the tag from the page. - Peripitus (Talk) 10:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)